RFV vs. YCS
RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RFV returned 12.72%/yr vs 13.62%/yr for YCS. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RFV charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
RFV vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a 12.16% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, RFV has underperformed YCS with an annualized return of 12.72%, while YCS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.62% annualized return.
RFV
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 12.16%
- 6M
- 11.00%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.04%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
YCS
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 9.63%
- 6M
- 10.44%
- 1Y
- 31.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.62%
RFV vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 12.16% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 14.74% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 9.63% | 9.04% | 35.41% | 28.70% | 29.09% | 22.38% | -11.18% | 3.37% | -1.49% | -6.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFV and YCS is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2008 | 0.18 |
The correlation between RFV and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFV vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
RFV
YCS
RFV vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 3.78 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.10 | 11.93 | -6.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFV vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than YCS's maximum drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.82% | -49.56% | -22.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -8.30% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.65% | -23.05% | -1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | -27.32% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -27.32% | -24.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -0.14% | -2.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.77% | -19.87% | +10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 2.65% | +1.59% |
Volatility
RFV vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) at 2.25%. This indicates that RFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 2.25% | +2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 12.19% | -0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.02% | 16.93% | +1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 21.10% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.94% | 18.82% | +6.12% |
RFV vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFV vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 1.70% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFV and YCS have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFV has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to YCS (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFV dropped -71.82% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 10-year performance, YCS leads with 13.62% vs 12.72% for RFV. On fees, RFV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, YCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, YCS has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RFV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
RFV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while YCS tracks USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RFV and 1.00% for YCS.
YCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFV and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer