RFV vs. JVAL
RFV (Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF) and JVAL (JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while JVAL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Value Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RFV returned 10.00%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for JVAL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JVAL.
Performance
RFV vs. JVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than JVAL's 19.44% return.
RFV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 3.75%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 10.71%
- 1Y
- 25.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.53%
JVAL
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.75%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 19.72%
- 1Y
- 39.93%
- 3Y*
- 22.05%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- —
RFV vs. JVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 13.04% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 6.72% |
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 19.44% | 16.16% | 14.53% | 19.48% | -11.58% | 31.31% | 6.43% | 28.37% | -8.94% | 5.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFV and JVAL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between RFV and JVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
RFV vs. JVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RFV
JVAL
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
RFV
JVAL
Financial Services
RFV
JVAL
Energy
RFV
JVAL
Technology
RFV
JVAL
Industrials
RFV
JVAL
Consumer Defensive
RFV
JVAL
Basic Materials
RFV
JVAL
Real Estate
RFV
JVAL
Healthcare
RFV
JVAL
Communication Services
RFV
-
JVAL
Utilities
RFV
-
JVAL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFV vs. JVAL — Risk / Return Rank
RFV
JVAL
RFV vs. JVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFV | JVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.51 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 4.73 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | 18.70 | -12.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFV | JVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.92 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.72 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.67 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
RFV vs. JVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than JVAL's maximum drawdown of -40.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and JVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFV | JVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.82% | -40.42% | -31.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -8.48% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.65% | -20.07% | -4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | -22.39% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.29% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -5.30% | -4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.23% | 2.14% | +2.09% |
Volatility
RFV vs. JVAL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) at 4.02%. This indicates that RFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFV | JVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 4.02% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 10.08% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.13% | 13.79% | +4.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 17.13% | +4.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.99% | 19.82% | +5.17% |
RFV vs. JVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JVAL's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFV vs. JVAL - Dividend Comparison
RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than JVAL's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JVAL JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF | 1.72% | 2.08% | 2.21% | 2.43% | 2.46% | 1.88% | 2.55% | 2.58% | 2.61% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 1.84% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFV and JVAL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to JVAL (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFV dropped -71.82% vs JVAL's -40.42%.
On 5-year performance, JVAL leads with 12.29% vs 10.00% for RFV. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JVAL has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFV.
RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.72% for JVAL.
RFV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while JVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RFV and 0.12% for JVAL.
JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFV and JVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer