PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFV vs. JVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFV vs. JVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a 13.04% return, which is significantly lower than JVAL's 19.44% return.


RFV

1D
-0.36%
1M
3.75%
YTD
13.04%
6M
10.71%
1Y
25.06%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
10.00%
10Y*
12.53%

JVAL

1D
-0.29%
1M
8.75%
YTD
19.44%
6M
19.72%
1Y
39.93%
3Y*
22.05%
5Y*
12.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFV vs. JVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
13.04%7.66%5.63%30.26%-3.99%33.02%9.61%24.98%-18.56%6.72%
JVAL
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
19.44%16.16%14.53%19.48%-11.58%31.31%6.43%28.37%-8.94%5.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RFV and JVAL is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.85

The correlation between RFV and JVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFV vs. JVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFV
JVAL

Consumer Cyclical

24.4%
10.5%

Financial Services

17.5%
9.3%

Energy

12.9%
3.5%

Technology

12.9%
39.2%

Industrials

11.4%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
3.1%

Basic Materials

7.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

3.5%
2.6%

Healthcare

0.7%
8.2%

Communication Services

-

6.9%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RFV
24.4%
JVAL
10.5%

Financial Services

RFV
17.5%
JVAL
9.3%

Energy

RFV
12.9%
JVAL
3.5%

Technology

RFV
12.9%
JVAL
39.2%

Industrials

RFV
11.4%
JVAL
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

RFV
9.1%
JVAL
3.1%

Basic Materials

RFV
7.6%
JVAL
2.1%

Real Estate

RFV
3.5%
JVAL
2.6%

Healthcare

RFV
0.7%
JVAL
8.2%

Communication Services

RFV

-

JVAL
6.9%

Utilities

RFV

-

JVAL
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFV vs. JVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFV
RFV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
RFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

JVAL
JVAL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
JVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
JVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFV vs. JVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFVJVALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

4.73

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.94

18.70

-12.76

RFV vs. JVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the JVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFV and JVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFVJVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.92

-1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.72

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.67

-0.29

Drawdowns

RFV vs. JVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than JVAL's maximum drawdown of -40.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and JVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFVJVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.82%

-40.42%

-31.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.51%

-8.48%

-4.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.65%

-20.07%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.65%

-22.39%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.29%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-5.30%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

2.14%

+2.09%

Volatility

RFV vs. JVAL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF (JVAL) at 4.02%. This indicates that RFV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFVJVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.02%

+0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

10.08%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.13%

13.79%

+4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.08%

17.13%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.99%

19.82%

+5.17%

RFV vs. JVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JVAL's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFV vs. JVAL - Dividend Comparison

RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, more than JVAL's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JVAL
JPMorgan U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.72%2.08%2.21%2.43%2.46%1.88%2.55%2.58%2.61%0.45%0.00%0.00%
RFV
Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF
1.84%2.07%1.31%1.27%2.05%1.60%1.52%1.71%1.39%1.36%0.88%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFV and JVAL have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to JVAL (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFV dropped -71.82% vs JVAL's -40.42%.

On 5-year performance, JVAL leads with 12.29% vs 10.00% for RFV. On fees, JVAL is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JVAL has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JVAL has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JVAL is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RFV.

RFV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.72% for JVAL.

RFV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while JVAL is Large Cap Value Equities. RFV tracks S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value, while JVAL tracks JP Morgan US Value Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RFV and 0.12% for JVAL.

JVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFV and JVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer