RFV vs. GABSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX).
RFV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Value. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. GABSX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Oct 22, 1991.
Performance
RFV vs. GABSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFV vs. GABSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.24% | 7.66% | 5.63% | 30.26% | -3.99% | 33.02% | 9.61% | 24.98% | -18.56% | 14.74% |
GABSX Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.38% | 8.65% | 10.22% | 21.45% | -12.63% | 24.82% | 13.63% | 21.56% | -15.25% | 19.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFV achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than GABSX's -0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, RFV has outperformed GABSX with an annualized return of 11.65%, while GABSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.
RFV
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 13.21%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
GABSX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- -0.38%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFV vs. GABSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GABSX's 1.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFV vs. GABSX — Risk / Return Rank
RFV
GABSX
RFV vs. GABSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) and Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFV | GABSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.14 | 1.18 | -0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 3.19 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFV | GABSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.72 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.38 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.49 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.62 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFV and GABSX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFV vs. GABSX - Dividend Comparison
RFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than GABSX's 4.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFV Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF | 2.04% | 2.07% | 1.31% | 1.27% | 2.05% | 1.60% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 1.79% |
GABSX Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund | 4.00% | 3.98% | 6.61% | 8.68% | 9.53% | 13.50% | 22.21% | 21.36% | 4.70% | 5.38% | 3.87% | 3.78% |
Drawdowns
RFV vs. GABSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFV drawdown since its inception was -71.82%, which is greater than GABSX's maximum drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFV and GABSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFV | GABSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.82% | -57.24% | -14.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.62% | -13.07% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.65% | -25.19% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -40.74% | -11.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.48% | -10.80% | +2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.85% | -7.00% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.78% | 3.82% | +0.96% |
Volatility
RFV vs. GABSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Value ETF (RFV) is 5.23%, while Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that RFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFV | GABSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 5.57% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | 11.31% | +1.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.40% | 20.19% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.22% | 18.98% | +3.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.05% | 19.89% | +5.16% |