PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GABSX vs. CRF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GABSX vs. CRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GABSX achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -3.18% return. Over the past 10 years, GABSX has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of 10.47%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.22% annualized return.


GABSX

1D
1.06%
1M
1.76%
YTD
10.16%
6M
10.01%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
14.28%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
10.47%

CRF

1D
-1.10%
1M
0.49%
YTD
-3.18%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GABSX vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GABSX
Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund
10.16%8.65%10.22%21.45%-12.63%24.82%13.63%21.56%-15.25%19.05%
CRF
Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.
-3.18%12.46%44.39%19.49%-36.70%39.73%28.13%21.74%-11.74%21.35%

Correlation

The correlation between GABSX and CRF is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 1991

0.27

The correlation between GABSX and CRF shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GABSX vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GABSX
GABSX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GABSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GABSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GABSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
GABSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GABSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

CRF
CRF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GABSX vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GABSXCRFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.51

0.86

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

1.28

+1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.17

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

0.89

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.28

3.00

+4.28

GABSX vs. CRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GABSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GABSX and CRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GABSXCRFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

0.86

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.39

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.05

+0.59

Drawdowns

GABSX vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GABSX drawdown since its inception was -57.24%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GABSX and CRF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GABSXCRFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.24%

-80.70%

+23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.45%

-14.88%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.43%

-29.66%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.19%

-43.12%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.74%

-45.90%

+5.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-4.96%

+3.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.98%

-22.32%

+15.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

4.41%

-0.99%

Volatility

GABSX vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison

Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund (GABSX) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 4.10%. This indicates that GABSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GABSXCRFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

4.10%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

13.31%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

15.35%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

25.07%

-6.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.00%

25.86%

-5.86%

GABSX vs. CRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GABSX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

GABSX vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison

GABSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than CRF's 19.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRF
Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.
19.60%17.38%14.32%19.94%29.31%13.41%18.91%21.67%24.85%17.96%24.08%23.58%
GABSX
Gabelli Small Cap Growth Fund
3.62%3.98%6.61%8.68%9.53%13.50%22.21%21.36%4.70%5.38%3.87%3.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


GABSX and CRF have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GABSX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to CRF (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GABSX dropped -57.24% vs CRF's -80.70%.

GABSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GABSX and CRF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer