RFRAX vs. ANGL
RFRAX (Columbia Floating Rate Fund) and ANGL (VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF) are both funds - RFRAX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Columbia, while ANGL is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the BofA Merrill Lynch US Fallen Angel High Yield Index. Over the past 10 years, RFRAX returned 4.34%/yr vs 6.27%/yr for ANGL. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RFRAX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ANGL.
Performance
RFRAX vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFRAX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RFRAX has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 4.34%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.27% annualized return.
RFRAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 4.34%
ANGL
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.64%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- 6.27%
RFRAX vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFRAX Columbia Floating Rate Fund | 1.46% | 5.83% | 6.55% | 11.01% | -2.90% | 4.53% | 1.03% | 7.60% | 0.08% | 3.82% |
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 1.55% | 9.04% | 6.06% | 12.52% | -14.26% | 6.84% | 13.20% | 18.06% | -5.84% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFRAX and ANGL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFRAX vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank
RFRAX
ANGL
RFRAX vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFRAX | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.76 | 1.37 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 2.02 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | 8.49 | +2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFRAX | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 1.90 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.75 | 0.45 | +1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | 0.68 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.74 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
RFRAX vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFRAX drawdown since its inception was -33.04%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFRAX and ANGL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFRAX | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.04% | -29.31% | -3.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.72% | -4.05% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.57% | -5.48% | +2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.90% | -19.25% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.74% | -29.31% | +7.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.30% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -3.30% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 0.96% | -0.47% |
Volatility
RFRAX vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) is 0.51%, while VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that RFRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFRAX | ANGL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 1.37% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.73% | 3.46% | -1.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25% | 4.31% | -2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.64% | 7.63% | -4.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.82% | 9.28% | -5.46% |
RFRAX vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFRAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFRAX vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison
RFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than ANGL's 6.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANGL VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF | 6.37% | 6.20% | 6.29% | 5.27% | 4.72% | 3.90% | 4.67% | 5.19% | 5.99% | 5.25% | 5.34% | 5.81% |
RFRAX Columbia Floating Rate Fund | 6.51% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.60% | 4.44% | 3.08% | 3.44% | 4.82% | 4.41% | 3.52% | 3.85% | 4.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFRAX and ANGL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANGL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to RFRAX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFRAX dropped -33.04% vs ANGL's -29.31%.
RFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFRAX and ANGL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer