PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFRAX vs. ANGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFRAX vs. ANGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFRAX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than ANGL's 1.55% return. Over the past 10 years, RFRAX has underperformed ANGL with an annualized return of 4.34%, while ANGL has yielded a comparatively higher 6.27% annualized return.


RFRAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.99%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
4.60%
10Y*
4.34%

ANGL

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.64%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
3.44%
10Y*
6.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFRAX vs. ANGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFRAX
Columbia Floating Rate Fund
1.46%5.83%6.55%11.01%-2.90%4.53%1.03%7.60%0.08%3.82%
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
1.55%9.04%6.06%12.52%-14.26%6.84%13.20%18.06%-5.84%9.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RFRAX and ANGL is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2012

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFRAX vs. ANGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFRAX
RFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
RFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ANGL
ANGL Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ANGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANGL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
ANGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFRAX vs. ANGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) and VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFRAXANGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.76

1.37

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

2.02

+1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

8.49

+2.16

RFRAX vs. ANGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the ANGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFRAX and ANGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFRAXANGLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

1.90

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.75

0.45

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.14

0.68

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.74

+0.36

Drawdowns

RFRAX vs. ANGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFRAX drawdown since its inception was -33.04%, which is greater than ANGL's maximum drawdown of -29.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFRAX and ANGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFRAXANGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.04%

-29.31%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.72%

-4.05%

+2.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.57%

-5.48%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.90%

-19.25%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.74%

-29.31%

+7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-3.30%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.96%

-0.47%

Volatility

RFRAX vs. ANGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) is 0.51%, while VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF (ANGL) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that RFRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFRAXANGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.51%

1.37%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.73%

3.46%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

4.31%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.64%

7.63%

-4.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.82%

9.28%

-5.46%

RFRAX vs. ANGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFRAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than ANGL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFRAX vs. ANGL - Dividend Comparison

RFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, more than ANGL's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANGL
VanEck Vectors Fallen Angel High Yield Bond ETF
6.37%6.20%6.29%5.27%4.72%3.90%4.67%5.19%5.99%5.25%5.34%5.81%
RFRAX
Columbia Floating Rate Fund
6.51%6.81%6.62%7.60%4.44%3.08%3.44%4.82%4.41%3.52%3.85%4.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFRAX and ANGL have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANGL has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to RFRAX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFRAX dropped -33.04% vs ANGL's -29.31%.

RFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFRAX and ANGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer