RFRAX vs. FFRHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX).
RFRAX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Feb 15, 2006. FFRHX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 16, 2000.
Performance
RFRAX vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFRAX vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFRAX Columbia Floating Rate Fund | -1.13% | 5.83% | 6.55% | 11.01% | -2.90% | 4.53% | 1.03% | 7.60% | 0.08% | 3.82% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | -0.50% | 5.47% | 7.10% | 12.63% | -1.55% | 5.01% | 1.69% | 8.63% | 0.10% | 3.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFRAX achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than FFRHX's -0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, RFRAX has underperformed FFRHX with an annualized return of 4.35%, while FFRHX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.99% annualized return.
RFRAX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.48%
- 5Y*
- 4.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.35%
FFRHX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- 0.77%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 7.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 4.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFRAX vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFRAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFRAX vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank
RFRAX
FFRHX
RFRAX vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFRAX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.42 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 2.01 | +0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.47 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 1.79 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.05 | 8.65 | -0.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFRAX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.42 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.67 | 1.84 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.13 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFRAX and FFRHX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RFRAX vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison
RFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, less than FFRHX's 6.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFRAX Columbia Floating Rate Fund | 6.19% | 6.81% | 6.62% | 7.60% | 4.44% | 3.08% | 3.44% | 4.82% | 4.41% | 3.52% | 3.85% | 4.10% |
FFRHX Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund | 6.75% | 7.41% | 6.94% | 8.24% | 3.81% | 2.74% | 3.84% | 5.15% | 4.74% | 4.05% | 4.44% | 3.69% |
Drawdowns
RFRAX vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFRAX drawdown since its inception was -33.04%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFRAX and FFRHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFRAX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.04% | -22.20% | -10.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | -2.63% | +0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.90% | -5.90% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.74% | -22.20% | +0.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -0.72% | -0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -1.16% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.59% | -0.01% |
Volatility
RFRAX vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Floating Rate Fund (RFRAX) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.65%. This indicates that RFRAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFRAX | FFRHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 0.65% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.73% | 1.62% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68% | 3.31% | -0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.61% | 2.84% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.81% | 4.13% | -0.32% |