RFIX vs. BUCK
RFIX (Simplify Bond Bull ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFIX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RFIX returned -14.76% vs 7.95% for BUCK. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RFIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
RFIX vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFIX achieves a 7.97% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 1.90% return.
RFIX
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -2.56%
- YTD
- 7.97%
- 6M
- -2.48%
- 1Y
- -14.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFIX vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 7.97% | -28.43% | -12.32% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.90% | 4.13% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFIX and BUCK is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFIX vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
RFIX
BUCK
RFIX vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFIX | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.54 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 6.11 | -6.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.01 | 32.31 | -33.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFIX | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.50 | 2.54 | -3.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 1.47 | -2.23 |
Drawdowns
RFIX vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFIX drawdown since its inception was -38.79%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIX and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFIX | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.79% | -5.43% | -33.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.48% | -1.31% | -24.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.25% | -0.04% | -32.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.11% | -0.49% | -23.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.70% | 0.25% | +14.45% |
Volatility
RFIX vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Bond Bull ETF (RFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that RFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFIX | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 0.70% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 1.53% | +18.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.75% | 3.14% | +26.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 3.49% | +27.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.90% | 3.49% | +27.41% |
RFIX vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFIX vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
RFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, less than BUCK's 7.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.42% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
RFIX Simplify Bond Bull ETF | 4.63% | 5.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFIX and BUCK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RFIX has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIX dropped -38.79% vs BUCK's -5.43%.
On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.95% vs -14.76% for RFIX. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.95% return vs -14.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RFIX.
BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.42%, compared with 4.63% for RFIX.
RFIX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while BUCK is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RFIX and 0.35% for BUCK.
BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFIX and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer