RFIMX vs. FCAGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX).
RFIMX is managed by Ranger Funds. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018. FCAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004.
Performance
RFIMX vs. FCAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFIMX vs. FCAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 0.96% | 1.99% | 11.52% | 9.14% | -24.26% | 30.58% | 44.44% | 24.94% | -0.56% |
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | -5.57% | 10.88% | 20.21% | 18.72% | -25.57% | 10.19% | 36.01% | 35.97% | -1.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFIMX achieves a 0.96% return, which is significantly higher than FCAGX's -5.57% return.
RFIMX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -6.11%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 16.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FCAGX
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -10.10%
- YTD
- -5.57%
- 6M
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFIMX vs. FCAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFIMX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FCAGX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFIMX vs. FCAGX — Risk / Return Rank
RFIMX
FCAGX
RFIMX vs. FCAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) and Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFIMX | FCAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.13 | +0.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.07 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.64 | 4.02 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFIMX | FCAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 | 0.14 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.45 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFIMX and FCAGX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFIMX vs. FCAGX - Dividend Comparison
RFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FCAGX's 7.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 1.31% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 47.82% | 71.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCAGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A | 7.35% | 6.94% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.36% | 8.58% | 5.58% | 14.80% | 7.05% | 0.79% | 4.32% |
Drawdowns
RFIMX vs. FCAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFIMX drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than FCAGX's maximum drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIMX and FCAGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFIMX | FCAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -61.19% | -38.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -13.76% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.41% | -39.13% | -60.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.24% | -13.19% | -86.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.70% | -11.57% | -16.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 3.66% | -0.25% |
Volatility
RFIMX vs. FCAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) is 6.22%, while Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class A (FCAGX) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that RFIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFIMX | FCAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 8.40% | -2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 16.05% | -2.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.27% | 24.51% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8,947.93% | 23.32% | +8,924.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7,425.82% | 22.69% | +7,403.13% |