RFIMX vs. DCDGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) and DCDGX (Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, RFIMX returned 4.20%/yr vs 3.85%/yr for DCDGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFIMX charges 1.51%/yr vs 2.83%/yr for DCDGX.

Performance

RFIMX vs. DCDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFIMX achieves a 20.93% return, which is significantly lower than DCDGX's 22.88% return.

RFIMX

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: 20.93%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 31.87%
• 3Y*: 8.52%
• 5Y*: 4.20%
• 10Y*: —

DCDGX

• 1D: 2.69%
• 1M: 5.61%
• YTD: 22.88%
• 6M: 19.33%
• 1Y: 43.57%
• 3Y*: 17.38%
• 5Y*: 3.85%
• 10Y*: 13.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFIMX vs. DCDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund	20.93%	1.99%	11.52%	9.14%	-24.26%	30.58%	44.44%	24.94%	-0.56%
DCDGX Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund	22.88%	11.14%	13.01%	20.48%	-33.69%	4.19%	67.17%	23.96%	-0.11%

Correlation

The correlation between RFIMX and DCDGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2018	0.87

The correlation between RFIMX and DCDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RFIMX vs. DCDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFIMX

RFIMX Risk / Return Rank: 47
RFIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RFIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RFIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RFIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RFIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

DCDGX

DCDGX Risk / Return Rank: 55
DCDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
DCDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DCDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
DCDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DCDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFIMX vs. DCDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) and Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFIMX	DCDGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.86	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.54	-0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.31	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	3.17	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.75	12.76	-3.01

RFIMX vs. DCDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFIMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the DCDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFIMX and DCDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFIMX vs. DCDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFIMX drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than DCDGX's maximum drawdown of -56.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIMX and DCDGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFIMX	DCDGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.41%	-56.02%	-43.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-13.42%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.41%	-27.95%	-71.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.41%	-48.05%	-51.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-48.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.09%	0.00%	-99.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-14.90%	-14.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.33%	-0.11%

Volatility

RFIMX vs. DCDGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) is 6.24%, while Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund (DCDGX) has a volatility of 8.75%. This indicates that RFIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFIMX	DCDGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	8.75%	-2.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.24%	17.91%	-3.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.47%	22.88%	-3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5,376.38%	25.86%	+5,350.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4,390.97%	24.88%	+4,366.09%

RFIMX vs. DCDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFIMX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is lower than DCDGX's 2.83% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFIMX vs. DCDGX - Dividend Comparison

RFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than DCDGX's 5.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DCDGX Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund	5.49%	6.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	29.30%	22.33%	2.06%	38.51%	20.51%	0.00%	11.22%
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund	1.10%	1.33%	0.00%	0.77%	47.82%	71.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFIMX and DCDGX in my portfolio?

RFIMX and DCDGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFIMX or DCDGX?

DCDGX has higher volatility (8.75%) compared to RFIMX (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIMX dropped -99.41% vs DCDGX's -56.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DCDGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.