RFG vs. SOXQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ).
RFG and SOXQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Pure Growth. It was launched on Mar 1, 2006. SOXQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2021. Both RFG and SOXQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RFG vs. SOXQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFG vs. SOXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 5.89% | 8.80% | 17.80% | 16.42% | -21.70% | 3.24% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 10.26% | 43.11% | 20.16% | 66.74% | -35.59% | 24.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFG achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than SOXQ's 10.26% return.
RFG
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 8.54%
- 1Y
- 26.07%
- 3Y*
- 15.48%
- 5Y*
- 5.10%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
SOXQ
- 1D
- 2.88%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 83.12%
- 3Y*
- 35.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFG vs. SOXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXQ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFG vs. SOXQ — Risk / Return Rank
RFG
SOXQ
RFG vs. SOXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 2.08 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 2.68 | -0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.38 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 4.79 | -2.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 17.49 | -8.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.08 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.60 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFG and SOXQ is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RFG vs. SOXQ - Dividend Comparison
RFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SOXQ's 0.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFG Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.38% | 0.99% | 0.78% | 0.05% | 0.27% | 0.64% | 0.76% | 0.66% | 0.35% | 0.61% |
SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | 0.46% | 0.50% | 0.68% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RFG vs. SOXQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFG drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than SOXQ's maximum drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFG and SOXQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.93% | -46.01% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.44% | -17.44% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.93% | -7.78% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.03% | -13.37% | +4.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 4.78% | -1.65% |
Volatility
RFG vs. SOXQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400® Pure Growth ETF (RFG) is 8.51%, while Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) has a volatility of 12.69%. This indicates that RFG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFG | SOXQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 12.69% | -4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.24% | 26.33% | -12.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.28% | 40.14% | -16.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 36.10% | -13.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 36.10% | -13.12% |