RFFC vs. UNOV
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV).
RFFC and UNOV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFFC is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. UNOV is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2019.
Performance
RFFC vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFFC vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | -0.91% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 22.33% | 12.48% | 5.23% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | -2.07% | 9.92% | 9.42% | 14.18% | -6.23% | 4.45% | 8.31% | 1.87% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's -2.07% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
UNOV
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 9.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 5.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFFC vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
UNOV
RFFC vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.71 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.27 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.73 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 8.24 | -0.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 1.16 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.79 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.78 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and UNOV is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFFC vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while UNOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.81% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% |
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and UNOV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -13.84% | -22.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -5.78% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -9.10% | -13.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -3.25% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -1.69% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 1.21% | +1.39% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) at 2.74%. This indicates that RFFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | UNOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 2.74% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 4.55% | +4.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 8.50% | +8.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 6.77% | +9.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 7.77% | +10.28% |