RFFC vs. IDOG
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG).
RFFC and IDOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFFC is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. IDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2013.
Performance
RFFC vs. IDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFFC vs. IDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | -0.91% | 16.83% | 23.51% | 19.50% | -14.58% | 22.33% | 12.48% | 24.77% | -10.23% | 21.02% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 8.50% | 39.94% | 1.35% | 23.57% | -4.50% | 11.33% | -1.78% | 21.93% | -13.47% | 25.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFFC achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than IDOG's 8.50% return.
RFFC
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 3.63%
- 1Y
- 20.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.07%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
IDOG
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 18.68%
- 1Y
- 37.17%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFFC vs. IDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFFC has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than IDOG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFFC vs. IDOG — Risk / Return Rank
RFFC
IDOG
RFFC vs. IDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) and ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFFC | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 2.27 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 3.08 | -1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.43 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 3.23 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.93 | 16.27 | -8.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFFC | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 2.27 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.88 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.50 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFFC and IDOG is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RFFC vs. IDOG - Dividend Comparison
RFFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than IDOG's 3.59% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFFC ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF | 0.81% | 0.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.41% | 0.71% | 1.79% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 0.93% | 0.66% | 0.00% |
IDOG ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.59% | 4.26% | 4.90% | 4.86% | 4.46% | 3.85% | 3.00% | 5.41% | 4.50% | 3.33% | 4.01% | 4.19% |
Drawdowns
RFFC vs. IDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFFC drawdown since its inception was -36.26%, roughly equal to the maximum IDOG drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFFC and IDOG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFFC | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.26% | -37.32% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.73% | -11.18% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.29% | -25.31% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -2.23% | -4.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -8.03% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.22% | +0.38% |
Volatility
RFFC vs. IDOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF (RFFC) is 5.35%, while ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that RFFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFFC | IDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 6.29% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 9.76% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.08% | 16.45% | +0.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 15.57% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 17.48% | +0.57% |