PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFEM vs. TDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFEM vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a 20.69% return, which is significantly higher than TDIV's 19.14% return. Over the past 10 years, RFEM has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 9.91%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 17.74% annualized return.


RFEM

1D
0.70%
1M
0.68%
6M
17.22%
YTD
20.69%
1Y
35.70%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
9.91%

TDIV

1D
-0.01%
1M
-1.68%
6M
15.59%
YTD
19.14%
1Y
26.95%
3Y*
27.29%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
17.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEM vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
20.69%27.71%10.85%20.78%-19.05%0.97%8.19%20.33%-18.80%35.73%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
19.14%25.27%24.43%36.71%-22.13%29.49%17.55%33.27%-3.18%21.95%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEM and TDIV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2016

0.66

The correlation between RFEM and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFEM vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFEM
TDIV

Technology

36.3%
87.1%

Financial Services

21.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%

-

Industrials

8.0%
1.3%

Energy

5.9%

-

Communication Services

5.0%
11.6%

Basic Materials

3.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Healthcare

2.4%

-

Utilities

1.3%

-

Real Estate

0.7%

-

Technology

RFEM
36.3%
TDIV
87.1%

Financial Services

RFEM
21.0%
TDIV

-

Consumer Cyclical

RFEM
12.7%
TDIV

-

Industrials

RFEM
8.0%
TDIV
1.3%

Energy

RFEM
5.9%
TDIV

-

Communication Services

RFEM
5.0%
TDIV
11.6%

Basic Materials

RFEM
3.9%
TDIV

-

Consumer Defensive

RFEM
2.9%
TDIV

-

Healthcare

RFEM
2.4%
TDIV

-

Utilities

RFEM
1.3%
TDIV

-

Real Estate

RFEM
0.7%
TDIV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFEM vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEM
RFEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
RFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TDIV
TDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEM vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFEMTDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.03

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.53

5.62

+5.91

RFEM vs. TDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the TDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFEM and TDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFEM vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and TDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFEMTDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.22%

-31.97%

-10.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.65%

-13.01%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-23.00%

+7.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.30%

-31.97%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

-31.97%

-10.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-10.39%

+8.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.89%

-4.87%

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

4.69%

-1.60%

Volatility

RFEM vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) have volatilities of 6.66% and 6.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFEMTDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

6.90%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.18%

15.98%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.31%

20.17%

-1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.16%

21.03%

-2.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

20.95%

-1.25%

RFEM vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFEM vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison

RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than TDIV's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFEM
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF
2.62%1.98%3.64%3.28%7.74%3.21%1.22%3.75%2.37%1.62%3.73%0.00%
TDIV
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund
1.32%1.40%1.59%1.74%2.51%1.76%2.07%2.27%2.97%2.27%2.45%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFEM and TDIV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDIV has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to RFEM (6.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFEM dropped -42.22% vs TDIV's -31.97%.

On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 17.74% vs 9.91% for RFEM. On fees, TDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RFEM has been the lower-risk option at 6.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RFEM.

RFEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.32% for TDIV.

RFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RFEM and 0.50% for TDIV.

RFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFEM and TDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer