RFEM vs. EMOP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RFEM (First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFEM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.

Performance

RFEM vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFEM achieves a 21.66% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 32.56% return.

RFEM

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 21.66%
• 6M: 23.54%
• 1Y: 45.49%
• 3Y*: 24.73%
• 5Y*: 8.99%
• 10Y*: —

EMOP

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 8.86%
• YTD: 32.56%
• 6M: 34.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFEM vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF	21.66%	16.47%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	32.56%	16.69%

Correlation

The correlation between RFEM and EMOP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	0.89

RFEM vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RFEM	EMOP
Technology	35.8%	30.3%
Financial Services	20.4%	24.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	7.8%
Industrials	7.9%	8.1%
Energy	6.6%	2.6%
Communication Services	5.7%	12.3%
Basic Materials	4.0%	7.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	1.4%
Healthcare	2.7%	1.6%
Utilities	1.4%	2.8%
Real Estate	0.7%	2.3%

Return for Risk

RFEM vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFEM

RFEM Risk / Return Rank: 81
RFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
RFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
RFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFEM vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF (RFEM) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFEM	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.99	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFEM	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	2.93	-2.41

Drawdowns

RFEM vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFEM drawdown since its inception was -42.22%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFEM and EMOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFEM	EMOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.22%	-12.88%	-29.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-0.72%	-0.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.98%	-1.90%	-10.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.85%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RFEM	EMOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.85%	19.85%	-3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.88%	19.85%	-1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.81%	19.85%	-0.04%

RFEM vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFEM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFEM vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

RFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than EMOP's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.82%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RFEM First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF	1.68%	1.98%	3.64%	3.28%	7.74%	3.21%	1.22%	3.75%	2.37%	1.62%	3.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFEM and EMOP in my portfolio?

RFEM and EMOP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RFEM or EMOP?

On fees, EMOP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RFEM or EMOP?

EMOP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for RFEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RFEM or EMOP?

RFEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.82% for EMOP.

What is the main difference between RFEM and EMOP?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for RFEM and 0.70% for EMOP.