PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFDTX vs. FTLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFDTX vs. FTLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Income R6 (RFDTX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with RFDTX at 4.89% and FTLSX at 4.89%.


RFDTX

1D
-0.41%
1M
1.38%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.36%
1Y
13.77%
3Y*
12.06%
5Y*
6.03%
10Y*
8.21%

FTLSX

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.21%
YTD
4.89%
6M
5.25%
1Y
11.13%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFDTX vs. FTLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFDTX
American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Income R6
4.89%14.54%9.35%11.95%-12.73%11.49%13.68%17.83%-3.46%7.12%
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
4.89%10.31%4.72%8.60%-11.33%3.30%9.04%10.97%-1.40%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDTX and FTLSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.80

The correlation between RFDTX and FTLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFDTX vs. FTLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDTX
RFDTX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RFDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

FTLSX
FTLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FTLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FTLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFDTX vs. FTLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Income R6 (RFDTX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFDTXFTLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.53

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

3.23

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.96

14.26

-2.30

RFDTX vs. FTLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the FTLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDTX and FTLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFDTXFTLSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.59

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.63

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.96

-0.12

Drawdowns

RFDTX vs. FTLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDTX drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, which is greater than FTLSX's maximum drawdown of -15.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDTX and FTLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFDTXFTLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.16%

-15.74%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.32%

-3.65%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.73%

-4.83%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.80%

-15.74%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.28%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-2.81%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

0.82%

+0.36%

Volatility

RFDTX vs. FTLSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Income R6 (RFDTX) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund (FTLSX) at 1.80%. This indicates that RFDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFDTXFTLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

1.80%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

3.81%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.02%

4.55%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.20%

5.43%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.93%

4.78%

+4.15%

RFDTX vs. FTLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDTX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FTLSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFDTX vs. FTLSX - Dividend Comparison

RFDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, more than FTLSX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend Income Fund
3.55%3.68%3.37%3.19%5.28%4.91%3.06%4.44%4.26%1.97%0.00%0.00%
RFDTX
American Funds 2025 Target Date Retirement Income R6
7.31%7.67%5.50%3.37%4.30%6.54%3.87%4.00%4.40%2.67%3.44%6.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, RFDTX and FTLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RFDTX has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to FTLSX (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDTX dropped -19.16% vs FTLSX's -15.74%.

FTLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFDTX and FTLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer