PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFDI vs. CGGR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFDI vs. CGGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFDI achieves a 7.65% return, which is significantly higher than CGGR's 6.30% return.


RFDI

1D
-0.69%
1M
1.91%
YTD
7.65%
6M
10.55%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
8.56%

CGGR

1D
-0.76%
1M
5.37%
YTD
6.30%
6M
6.76%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
25.64%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFDI vs. CGGR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
7.65%35.95%5.56%18.14%-13.02%
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
6.30%19.75%32.12%42.18%-18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between RFDI and CGGR is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.69

The correlation between RFDI and CGGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

RFDI vs. CGGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RFDI
CGGR

Financial Services

27.2%
5.2%

Energy

11.5%
2.2%

Industrials

11.3%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
13.0%

Healthcare

8.8%
9.2%

Technology

7.9%
37.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
2.1%

Communication Services

4.8%
16.9%

Utilities

4.7%
0.9%

Basic Materials

4.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.8%

Financial Services

RFDI
27.2%
CGGR
5.2%

Energy

RFDI
11.5%
CGGR
2.2%

Industrials

RFDI
11.3%
CGGR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RFDI
10.2%
CGGR
13.0%

Healthcare

RFDI
8.8%
CGGR
9.2%

Technology

RFDI
7.9%
CGGR
37.9%

Consumer Defensive

RFDI
7.0%
CGGR
2.1%

Communication Services

RFDI
4.8%
CGGR
16.9%

Utilities

RFDI
4.7%
CGGR
0.9%

Basic Materials

RFDI
4.6%
CGGR
2.3%

Real Estate

RFDI
1.9%
CGGR
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFDI vs. CGGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFDI
RFDI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
RFDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RFDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFDI Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CGGR
CGGR Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CGGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGGR Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CGGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFDI vs. CGGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) and Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFDICGGRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.25

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.49

+0.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.55

5.48

+3.07

RFDI vs. CGGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFDI Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the CGGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFDI and CGGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFDICGGRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

1.39

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.78

-0.29

Drawdowns

RFDI vs. CGGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFDI drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, which is greater than CGGR's maximum drawdown of -28.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDI and CGGR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFDICGGRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-28.90%

-10.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

-15.13%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.44%

-23.37%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.51%

-1.05%

-1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-7.72%

-1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

4.09%

-1.28%

Volatility

RFDI vs. CGGR - Volatility Comparison

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF (RFDI) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR) at 4.18%. This indicates that RFDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFDICGGRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

4.18%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.90%

12.40%

-0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

16.24%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.76%

21.78%

-5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

21.78%

-4.42%

RFDI vs. CGGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFDI has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than CGGR's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFDI vs. CGGR - Dividend Comparison

RFDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than CGGR's 0.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
0.09%0.10%0.33%0.40%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RFDI
First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Developed International ETF
3.28%3.45%5.21%2.43%5.00%3.22%1.34%2.72%2.59%1.63%1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFDI and CGGR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFDI has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to CGGR (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDI dropped -39.40% vs CGGR's -28.90%.

On 3-year performance, CGGR leads with 25.64% vs 19.21% for RFDI. On fees, CGGR is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CGGR has been the lower-risk option at 4.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, CGGR has performed better with a 25.64% return vs 19.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CGGR is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.83% for RFDI.

RFDI has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 0.09% for CGGR.

RFDI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CGGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.83% for RFDI and 0.39% for CGGR.

RFDI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFDI and CGGR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer