RFDA vs. OUSA
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA).
RFDA and OUSA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFDA is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. OUSA is a passively managed fund by O'Shares Investments that tracks the performance of the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. It was launched on Jul 14, 2015.
Performance
RFDA vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFDA vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | -1.05% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -9.27% | 19.86% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | -3.17% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 25.03% | -3.11% | 18.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's -3.17% return.
RFDA
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
OUSA
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -6.28%
- YTD
- -3.17%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- 1Y
- 6.15%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.66%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFDA vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFDA vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank
RFDA
OUSA
RFDA vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFDA | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.45 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 0.74 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.10 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.75 | +0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 3.10 | +5.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFDA | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.45 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.65 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.66 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFDA and OUSA is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFDA vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison
RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than OUSA's 1.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.99% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.46% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
Drawdowns
RFDA vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, roughly equal to the maximum OUSA drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and OUSA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFDA | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -33.12% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -9.80% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -19.54% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -6.65% | +3.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -3.53% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.39% | +0.10% |
Volatility
RFDA vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) at 3.78%. This indicates that RFDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFDA | OUSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.78% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 7.27% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 13.88% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 13.31% | +2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 15.15% | +1.78% |