RFDA vs. KNG
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG).
RFDA and KNG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFDA is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 7, 2016. KNG is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. It was launched on Mar 26, 2018.
Performance
RFDA vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFDA vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | -1.05% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -7.51% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 1.24% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -7.03% | 24.78% | 7.21% | 26.64% | -0.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 1.24% return.
RFDA
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 20.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFDA vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFDA vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
RFDA
KNG
RFDA vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFDA | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 0.37 | +0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 0.62 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.08 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.58 | +1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.46 | 2.11 | +6.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFDA | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.37 | +0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.42 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.49 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFDA and KNG is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RFDA vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.99% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RFDA vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, roughly equal to the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and KNG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFDA | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -35.12% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.73% | -10.55% | -2.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -18.20% | -1.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -6.77% | +3.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.80% | -4.09% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.91% | -0.42% |
Volatility
RFDA vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 3.41%. This indicates that RFDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFDA | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.41% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.90% | 7.48% | +1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.70% | 13.68% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 13.63% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 17.31% | -0.38% |