RFDA vs. DTEC
RFDA (RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF) and DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RFDA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by SS&C, while DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index. RFDA is actively managed, while DTEC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RFDA returned 12.76%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for DTEC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFDA charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DTEC.
Performance
RFDA vs. DTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFDA achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than DTEC's 0.40% return.
RFDA
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 22.85%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.41%
DTEC
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- -0.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.85%
- 5Y*
- 0.55%
- 10Y*
- —
RFDA vs. DTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 12.87% | 16.42% | 20.12% | 16.98% | -8.58% | 25.94% | 11.26% | 27.15% | -9.27% | -0.33% |
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 0.40% | 7.21% | 9.89% | 25.03% | -31.29% | 4.89% | 44.12% | 35.44% | -4.96% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFDA and DTEC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2017 | 0.78 |
The correlation between RFDA and DTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RFDA vs. DTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RFDA
DTEC
Technology
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
RFDA
DTEC
Financial Services
RFDA
DTEC
Energy
RFDA
DTEC
Healthcare
RFDA
DTEC
Industrials
RFDA
DTEC
Communication Services
RFDA
DTEC
Consumer Cyclical
RFDA
DTEC
Consumer Defensive
RFDA
DTEC
-
Real Estate
RFDA
DTEC
Utilities
RFDA
DTEC
Basic Materials
RFDA
DTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFDA vs. DTEC — Risk / Return Rank
RFDA
DTEC
RFDA vs. DTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) and ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RFDA | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.01 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | -0.01 | +4.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.94 | -0.03 | +14.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RFDA vs. DTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFDA drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum DTEC drawdown of -42.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFDA and DTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFDA | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -42.00% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.45% | -20.31% | +14.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.35% | -21.47% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.35% | -42.00% | +22.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -7.52% | +6.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -13.25% | +9.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 9.21% | -7.68% |
Volatility
RFDA vs. DTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF (RFDA) is 2.41%, while ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that RFDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFDA | DTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 5.07% | -2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.80% | 15.19% | -6.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.59% | 18.82% | -7.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.74% | 22.21% | -6.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 22.85% | -6.01% |
RFDA vs. DTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFDA has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than DTEC's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFDA vs. DTEC - Dividend Comparison
RFDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than DTEC's 0.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.45% | 0.27% | 0.02% | 0.26% | 0.37% | 0.43% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFDA RiverFront Dynamic US Dividend Advantage ETF | 1.77% | 1.89% | 2.23% | 2.68% | 3.57% | 1.44% | 1.62% | 1.87% | 2.44% | 1.90% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFDA and DTEC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DTEC has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to RFDA (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFDA dropped -34.60% vs DTEC's -42.00%.
On 5-year performance, RFDA leads with 12.76% vs 0.55% for DTEC. On fees, DTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RFDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RFDA has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 0.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for RFDA.
RFDA has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.04% for DTEC.
RFDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DTEC is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for RFDA and 0.50% for DTEC.
RFDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFDA and DTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer