PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFCYX vs. VGSBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFCYX vs. VGSBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio (VGSBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFCYX achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VGSBX's 1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, RFCYX has underperformed VGSBX with an annualized return of 1.63%, while VGSBX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.80% annualized return.


RFCYX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.80%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.21%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
1.63%

VGSBX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.06%
6M
0.95%
1Y
4.31%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
2.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFCYX vs. VGSBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
0.33%7.55%1.11%4.92%-14.07%-1.55%8.98%9.57%-0.54%4.04%
VGSBX
VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio
1.06%6.12%0.68%5.65%-11.86%1.15%17.48%10.01%-1.55%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RFCYX and VGSBX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.84

The correlation between RFCYX and VGSBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFCYX vs. VGSBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFCYX
RFCYX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
RFCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RFCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VGSBX
VGSBX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
VGSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFCYX vs. VGSBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio (VGSBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFCYXVGSBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.25

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.87

-1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

9.09

-5.01

RFCYX vs. VGSBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the VGSBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFCYX and VGSBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFCYX vs. VGSBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than VGSBX's maximum drawdown of -18.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCYX and VGSBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFCYXVGSBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-18.20%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-1.79%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-10.28%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.34%

-18.20%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.34%

-18.20%

-1.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.59%

-0.10%

-3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-3.43%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.55%

+0.52%

Volatility

RFCYX vs. VGSBX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio (VGSBX) at 0.65%. This indicates that RFCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFCYXVGSBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.65%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

2.71%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

4.61%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

7.94%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.00%

6.24%

-1.24%

RFCYX vs. VGSBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFCYX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than VGSBX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFCYX vs. VGSBX - Dividend Comparison

RFCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%, more than VGSBX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
5.23%5.18%4.89%2.77%2.77%2.13%7.15%3.70%2.41%1.29%4.92%4.06%
VGSBX
VY BrandywineGLOBAL - Bond Portfolio
3.89%3.93%4.56%2.18%6.85%8.48%2.48%1.89%2.29%2.31%2.34%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFCYX and VGSBX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFCYX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to VGSBX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFCYX dropped -19.34% vs VGSBX's -18.20%.

RFCYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFCYX and VGSBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer