RFCYX vs. TGLMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RFCYX (Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund) and TGLMX (TCW Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, RFCYX returned 1.67%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for TGLMX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFCYX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for TGLMX.

Performance

RFCYX vs. TGLMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFCYX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than TGLMX's 0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, RFCYX has outperformed TGLMX with an annualized return of 1.67%, while TGLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.51% annualized return.

RFCYX

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: -0.01%
• 6M: 0.14%
• 1Y: 4.46%
• 3Y*: 3.74%
• 5Y*: -0.32%
• 10Y*: 1.67%

TGLMX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 6.18%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: -0.22%
• 10Y*: 1.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFCYX vs. TGLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RFCYX Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund	-0.01%	7.55%	1.11%	4.92%	-14.07%	-1.55%	8.98%	9.57%	-0.54%	4.04%
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund	0.99%	8.99%	1.82%	5.05%	-16.59%	-1.05%	8.32%	7.28%	0.80%	3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between RFCYX and TGLMX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005	0.85

The correlation between RFCYX and TGLMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RFCYX vs. TGLMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFCYX

RFCYX Risk / Return Rank: 24
RFCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RFCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
RFCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
RFCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
RFCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

TGLMX

TGLMX Risk / Return Rank: 38
TGLMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
TGLMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
TGLMX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TGLMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
TGLMX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFCYX vs. TGLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RFCYX	TGLMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.61	-0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	2.43	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	2.68	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.18	8.08	-2.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RFCYX vs. TGLMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFCYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the TGLMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFCYX and TGLMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RFCYX	TGLMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.35	1.61	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.05	-0.03	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	0.27	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.40	+0.35

Drawdowns

RFCYX vs. TGLMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum TGLMX drawdown of -22.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCYX and TGLMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFCYX	TGLMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.34%	-22.26%	+2.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.92%	-2.63%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.33%	-8.56%	+2.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.34%	-22.17%	+2.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.34%	-22.26%	+2.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.92%	-2.98%	-0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.38%	-3.80%	+0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.00%	0.87%	+0.13%

Volatility

RFCYX vs. TGLMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) is 1.25%, while TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that RFCYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFCYX	TGLMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	1.44%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.68%	2.99%	-0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.84%	4.39%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.97%	7.05%	-1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.00%	5.59%	-0.59%

RFCYX vs. TGLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFCYX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than TGLMX's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFCYX vs. TGLMX - Dividend Comparison

RFCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, less than TGLMX's 6.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RFCYX Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund	5.25%	5.18%	4.89%	2.77%	2.77%	2.13%	7.15%	3.70%	2.41%	1.29%	4.92%	4.06%
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund	6.76%	7.19%	6.52%	6.13%	3.27%	2.08%	3.37%	4.07%	3.55%	2.89%	4.13%	2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFCYX and TGLMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, RFCYX and TGLMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RFCYX or TGLMX?

TGLMX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to RFCYX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFCYX dropped -19.34% vs TGLMX's -22.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TGLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.