RFCYX vs. SMTRX
RFCYX (Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund) and SMTRX (ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RFCYX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SMTRX.
Performance
RFCYX vs. SMTRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
RFCYX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 4.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.74%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
SMTRX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RFCYX vs. SMTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
RFCYX Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund | -0.21% |
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCYX and SMTRX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFCYX vs. SMTRX — Risk / Return Rank
RFCYX
SMTRX
RFCYX vs. SMTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund (SMTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFCYX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.18 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFCYX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | -2.96 | +3.71 |
Drawdowns
RFCYX vs. SMTRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, which is greater than SMTRX's maximum drawdown of -0.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCYX and SMTRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCYX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.34% | -0.21% | -19.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.92% | -0.21% | -3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.38% | -0.08% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | — | — |
Volatility
RFCYX vs. SMTRX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFCYX | SMTRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 2.47% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.97% | 2.47% | +3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 2.47% | +2.53% |
RFCYX vs. SMTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCYX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SMTRX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFCYX vs. SMTRX - Dividend Comparison
RFCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than SMTRX's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCYX Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund | 5.25% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.13% | 7.15% | 3.70% | 2.41% | 1.29% | 4.92% | 4.06% |
SMTRX ALPS/Smith Total Return Bond Fund | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, RFCYX and SMTRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for RFCYX and SMTRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer