PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFCYX vs. AAIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFCYX vs. AAIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFCYX achieves a -0.47% return, which is significantly lower than AAIIX's 2.03% return. Over the past 10 years, RFCYX has underperformed AAIIX with an annualized return of 1.43%, while AAIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.82% annualized return.


RFCYX

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.90%
6M
-0.63%
YTD
-0.47%
1Y
1.93%
3Y*
3.93%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
1.43%
ALL TIME*
3.26%

AAIIX

1D
0.43%
1M
0.64%
6M
-0.01%
YTD
2.03%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
6.12%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
2.82%
ALL TIME*
1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RFCYX vs. AAIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
-0.47%7.55%1.11%4.92%-14.07%-1.55%8.98%9.57%-0.54%4.04%
AAIIX
Ancora Income Fund
2.03%2.28%9.23%9.46%-14.32%9.21%3.72%11.08%-5.60%6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between RFCYX and AAIIX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2005

0.21

Over the past year, RFCYX and AAIIX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.21, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFCYX vs. AAIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RFCYX
RFCYX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RFCYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFCYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFCYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RFCYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFCYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

AAIIX
AAIIX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AAIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AAIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RFCYX vs. AAIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) and Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFCYXAAIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.17

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

1.00

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.68

2.68

-0.99

RFCYX vs. AAIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFCYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the AAIIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFCYX and AAIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFCYX vs. AAIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFCYX drawdown since its inception was -19.34%, smaller than the maximum AAIIX drawdown of -98.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCYX and AAIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFCYXAAIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.34%

-98.01%

+78.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-4.19%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.52%

-98.01%

+92.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.11%

-98.01%

+78.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.34%

-98.01%

+78.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.36%

-97.79%

+93.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-12.97%

+9.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

1.57%

-0.36%

Volatility

RFCYX vs. AAIIX - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund (RFCYX) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to Ancora Income Fund (AAIIX) at 0.98%. This indicates that RFCYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFCYXAAIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

0.98%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

3.43%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61%

4.51%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

2,046.08%

-2,040.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

1,446.22%

-1,441.21%

RFCYX vs. AAIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFCYX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than AAIIX's 2.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFCYX vs. AAIIX - Dividend Comparison

RFCYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.95%, more than AAIIX's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAIIX
Ancora Income Fund
4.89%4.09%4.57%4.77%4.52%4.46%5.68%3.96%4.36%5.69%6.40%6.99%
RFCYX
Russell Investments Strategic Bond Fund
4.95%5.18%4.89%2.77%2.77%2.13%7.15%3.70%2.41%1.29%4.92%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFCYX and AAIIX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RFCYX has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to AAIIX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFCYX dropped -19.34% vs AAIIX's -98.01%.

AAIIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFCYX and AAIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer