RFCI vs. RDOG
Compare and contrast key facts about RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG).
RFCI and RDOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RFCI is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016. RDOG is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. It was launched on May 7, 2008.
Performance
RFCI vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RFCI vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | -0.19% | 6.85% | 2.64% | 5.97% | -9.27% | -1.48% | 6.48% | 8.69% | -1.30% | 3.14% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 0.59% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFCI achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than RDOG's 0.59% return.
RFCI
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- -0.19%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
RDOG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- 1.74%
- 3Y*
- 6.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.15%
- 10Y*
- 2.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RFCI vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFCI has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RFCI vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank
RFCI
RDOG
RFCI vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFCI | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 0.10 | +0.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 0.26 | +1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.03 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 0.12 | +1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 0.40 | +4.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFCI | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 0.10 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.06 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.14 | +0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between RFCI and RDOG is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RFCI vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison
RFCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than RDOG's 6.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFCI RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF | 4.51% | 4.55% | 4.30% | 3.55% | 2.26% | 3.45% | 2.04% | 2.66% | 2.76% | 2.03% | 1.97% | 0.00% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.94% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
Drawdowns
RFCI vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFCI drawdown since its inception was -14.18%, smaller than the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFCI and RDOG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFCI | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.18% | -67.59% | +53.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.61% | -13.61% | +11.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.46% | -35.52% | +22.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.69% | -13.38% | +11.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -12.33% | +9.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.82% | 4.15% | -3.33% |
Volatility
RFCI vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RiverFront Dynamic Core Income ETF (RFCI) is 1.54%, while ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that RFCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RFCI | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 5.46% | -3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | 10.18% | -7.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.04% | 17.71% | -13.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 19.84% | -14.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.96% | 23.02% | -18.06% |