PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFBAX vs. PYGNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFBAX vs. PYGNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFBAX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than PYGNX's 0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, RFBAX has outperformed PYGNX with an annualized return of 1.06%, while PYGNX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.75% annualized return.


RFBAX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.15%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
1.06%

PYGNX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.60%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.92%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
3.64%
5Y*
-0.27%
10Y*
0.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFBAX vs. PYGNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
0.88%4.49%4.33%3.63%-5.29%-1.48%1.69%3.23%0.42%0.21%
PYGNX
Payden GNMA Fund
0.60%7.54%0.84%3.93%-12.54%-2.26%4.27%5.67%0.37%1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between RFBAX and PYGNX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 1999

0.58

The correlation between RFBAX and PYGNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFBAX vs. PYGNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFBAX
RFBAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RFBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RFBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PYGNX
PYGNX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PYGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PYGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFBAX vs. PYGNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFBAXPYGNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.23

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

1.62

+2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.74

5.00

+11.74

RFBAX vs. PYGNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the PYGNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFBAX and PYGNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFBAX vs. PYGNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFBAX drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, smaller than the maximum PYGNX drawdown of -19.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFBAX and PYGNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFBAXPYGNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-19.64%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.77%

-3.40%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.88%

-8.09%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.50%

-18.72%

+11.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.03%

-19.64%

+11.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-3.18%

+2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-2.31%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

1.10%

-0.90%

Volatility

RFBAX vs. PYGNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) is 0.55%, while Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that RFBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYGNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFBAXPYGNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

1.20%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.30%

3.29%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88%

4.30%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.10%

6.43%

-4.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

4.89%

-3.10%

RFBAX vs. PYGNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFBAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than PYGNX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFBAX vs. PYGNX - Dividend Comparison

RFBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than PYGNX's 3.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PYGNX
Payden GNMA Fund
3.93%3.80%3.63%2.64%3.70%2.74%2.80%3.34%3.26%3.24%3.07%3.59%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
3.04%3.01%3.23%2.15%0.80%0.57%0.93%1.67%1.17%0.59%0.68%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFBAX and PYGNX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYGNX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to RFBAX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFBAX dropped -8.03% vs PYGNX's -19.64%.

RFBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFBAX and PYGNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer