PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFBAX vs. HLGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFBAX vs. HLGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and JPMorgan Government Bond Fund (HLGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFBAX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than HLGAX's -0.07% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RFBAX having a 1.10% annualized return and HLGAX not far ahead at 1.14%.


RFBAX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.45%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.34%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
4.04%
5Y*
1.38%
10Y*
1.10%

HLGAX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.73%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
0.02%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
3.39%
5Y*
-0.24%
10Y*
1.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFBAX vs. HLGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
1.08%4.49%4.33%3.63%-5.29%-1.48%1.69%3.23%0.42%0.21%
HLGAX
JPMorgan Government Bond Fund
-0.07%6.70%1.26%4.38%-11.85%-2.12%6.95%6.58%0.84%2.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RFBAX and HLGAX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between RFBAX and HLGAX has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFBAX vs. HLGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFBAX
RFBAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RFBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RFBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HLGAX
HLGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
HLGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
HLGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFBAX vs. HLGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and JPMorgan Government Bond Fund (HLGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFBAXHLGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.19

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

1.18

+3.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.80

3.32

+14.48

RFBAX vs. HLGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the HLGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFBAX and HLGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFBAX vs. HLGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFBAX drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, smaller than the maximum HLGAX drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFBAX and HLGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFBAXHLGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-17.41%

+9.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.77%

-3.32%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.88%

-5.89%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.50%

-16.46%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.03%

-17.41%

+9.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.53%

+3.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-2.54%

+1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

1.17%

-0.97%

Volatility

RFBAX vs. HLGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) is 0.53%, while JPMorgan Government Bond Fund (HLGAX) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that RFBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFBAXHLGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

1.15%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

2.80%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86%

3.71%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.10%

5.57%

-3.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

4.57%

-2.78%

RFBAX vs. HLGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFBAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than HLGAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFBAX vs. HLGAX - Dividend Comparison

RFBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than HLGAX's 3.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLGAX
JPMorgan Government Bond Fund
3.11%2.91%2.86%2.56%2.12%1.49%1.80%2.36%2.45%2.44%2.78%3.99%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
3.03%3.01%3.23%2.15%0.80%0.57%0.93%1.67%1.17%0.59%0.68%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFBAX and HLGAX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLGAX has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to RFBAX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFBAX dropped -8.03% vs HLGAX's -17.41%.

RFBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFBAX and HLGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer