PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFBAX vs. LTUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFBAX achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than LTUSX's 0.35% return. Over the past 10 years, RFBAX has outperformed LTUSX with an annualized return of 1.09%, while LTUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.96% annualized return.


RFBAX

1D
0.19%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.88%
YTD
1.14%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
1.09%
ALL TIME*
2.62%

LTUSX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.25%
6M
0.00%
YTD
0.35%
1Y
2.49%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
0.54%
10Y*
0.96%
ALL TIME*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
1.14%4.49%4.33%3.63%-5.29%-1.48%1.69%3.23%0.42%0.21%
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
0.35%6.40%2.40%3.40%-8.06%-1.82%3.77%3.61%0.98%0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between RFBAX and LTUSX is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1995

0.67

The correlation between RFBAX and LTUSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFBAX vs. LTUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RFBAX
RFBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RFBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
RFBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

LTUSX
LTUSX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LTUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
LTUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RFBAXLTUSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.21

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

1.48

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.95

3.50

+12.45

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the LTUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFBAX and LTUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFBAX drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, smaller than the maximum LTUSX drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFBAX and LTUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFBAXLTUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-12.34%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.77%

-2.31%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.88%

-3.23%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.50%

-11.69%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.03%

-12.34%

+4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.62%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-1.40%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.21%

0.97%

-0.76%

Volatility

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) is 0.53%, while Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that RFBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFBAXLTUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

0.75%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

2.27%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86%

2.88%

-1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.12%

4.04%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.78%

3.10%

-1.32%

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFBAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LTUSX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Dividend Comparison

RFBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than LTUSX's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
2.48%2.69%2.62%1.89%1.63%1.21%1.35%1.77%1.90%1.45%2.52%1.50%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
2.78%3.01%3.23%2.15%0.80%0.57%0.93%1.67%1.17%0.59%0.68%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFBAX and LTUSX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTUSX has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to RFBAX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFBAX dropped -8.03% vs LTUSX's -12.34%.

RFBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFBAX and LTUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer