PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RFBAX vs. LTUSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFBAX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than LTUSX's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RFBAX has outperformed LTUSX with an annualized return of 1.08%, while LTUSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.02% annualized return.


RFBAX

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.15%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
3.97%
5Y*
1.31%
10Y*
1.08%

LTUSX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.61%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
1.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
0.88%4.49%4.33%3.63%-5.29%-1.48%1.69%3.23%0.42%0.21%
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
0.47%6.40%2.40%3.40%-8.06%-1.82%3.77%3.61%0.98%0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between RFBAX and LTUSX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.67

The correlation between RFBAX and LTUSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RFBAX vs. LTUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFBAX
RFBAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RFBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RFBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
RFBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RFBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RFBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LTUSX
LTUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LTUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LTUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RFBAXLTUSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.74

1.47

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

2.19

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.26

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

2.03

+2.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.20

6.18

+13.02

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the LTUSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFBAX and LTUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RFBAXLTUSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

1.47

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.17

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.33

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

1.15

-0.10

Drawdowns

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFBAX drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, smaller than the maximum LTUSX drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFBAX and LTUSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RFBAXLTUSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-12.34%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.77%

-2.31%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.88%

-3.69%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.61%

-11.69%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.03%

-12.34%

+4.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.50%

+1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-1.40%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

0.76%

-0.57%

Volatility

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) is 0.59%, while Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) has a volatility of 0.95%. This indicates that RFBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RFBAXLTUSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

0.95%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

2.05%

-0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90%

2.93%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.10%

4.02%

-1.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.79%

3.08%

-1.29%

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFBAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LTUSX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

RFBAX vs. LTUSX - Dividend Comparison

RFBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, more than LTUSX's 2.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
2.63%2.69%2.62%1.89%1.63%1.21%1.35%1.77%1.90%1.45%2.52%1.50%
RFBAX
Davis Government Bond Fund
3.04%3.01%3.23%2.15%0.80%0.57%0.93%1.67%1.17%0.59%0.68%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


RFBAX and LTUSX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTUSX has higher volatility (0.95%) compared to RFBAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFBAX dropped -8.03% vs LTUSX's -12.34%.

RFBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RFBAX and LTUSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer