PYGNX vs. PYVLX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PYGNX (Payden GNMA Fund) and PYVLX (Payden Equity Income Fund) are both mutual funds - PYGNX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Paydenfunds, while PYVLX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Paydenfunds. Over the past 10 years, PYGNX returned 0.75%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for PYVLX. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. PYGNX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for PYVLX.

Performance

PYGNX vs. PYVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX) and Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PYGNX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly lower than PYVLX's 9.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PYGNX has underperformed PYVLX with an annualized return of 0.75%, while PYVLX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.

PYGNX

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 0.60%
• 6M: 0.92%
• 1Y: 5.36%
• 3Y*: 3.64%
• 5Y*: -0.27%
• 10Y*: 0.75%

PYVLX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: -0.16%
• YTD: 9.11%
• 6M: 8.27%
• 1Y: 19.73%
• 3Y*: 15.38%
• 5Y*: 8.60%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PYGNX vs. PYVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PYGNX Payden GNMA Fund	0.60%	7.54%	0.84%	3.93%	-12.54%	-2.26%	4.27%	5.67%	0.37%	1.33%
PYVLX Payden Equity Income Fund	9.11%	11.41%	15.94%	5.37%	-6.68%	23.39%	0.77%	27.95%	-6.69%	15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PYGNX and PYVLX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 1999	-0.07

The correlation between PYGNX and PYVLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (all time) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PYGNX vs. PYVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PYGNX

PYGNX Risk / Return Rank: 23
PYGNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
PYGNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PYGNX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
PYGNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
PYGNX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

PYVLX

PYVLX Risk / Return Rank: 67
PYVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PYVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
PYVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PYVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PYVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PYGNX vs. PYVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX) and Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PYGNX	PYVLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	2.11	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.99	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.38	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	3.46	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.00	13.71	-8.71

PYGNX vs. PYVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PYGNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the PYVLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PYGNX and PYVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PYGNX vs. PYVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PYGNX drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, smaller than the maximum PYVLX drawdown of -60.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PYGNX and PYVLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PYGNX	PYVLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-60.67%	+41.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.40%	-6.07%	+2.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.09%	-16.41%	+8.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.72%	-25.96%	+7.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.64%	-33.24%	+13.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-1.29%	-1.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.31%	-10.44%	+8.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.10%	1.53%	-0.43%

Volatility

PYGNX vs. PYVLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Payden GNMA Fund (PYGNX) is 1.20%, while Payden Equity Income Fund (PYVLX) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that PYGNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PYGNX	PYVLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	3.31%	-2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.29%	7.78%	-4.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.30%	9.97%	-5.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.43%	16.55%	-10.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.89%	16.54%	-11.65%

PYGNX vs. PYVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PYGNX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PYVLX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

PYGNX vs. PYVLX - Dividend Comparison

PYGNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than PYVLX's 5.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PYGNX Payden GNMA Fund	3.93%	3.80%	3.63%	2.64%	3.70%	2.74%	2.80%	3.34%	3.26%	3.24%	3.07%	3.59%
PYVLX Payden Equity Income Fund	5.98%	6.38%	17.91%	2.94%	6.72%	20.13%	1.88%	4.97%	2.98%	7.10%	3.25%	2.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PYGNX and PYVLX in my portfolio?

PYGNX and PYVLX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PYGNX or PYVLX?

PYVLX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to PYGNX (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PYGNX dropped -19.64% vs PYVLX's -60.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PYVLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.