RFBAX vs. FNBGX
RFBAX (Davis Government Bond Fund) and FNBGX (Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund) are both Government Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, RFBAX returned 1.31%/yr vs -5.10%/yr for FNBGX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RFBAX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FNBGX.
Performance
RFBAX vs. FNBGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RFBAX achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than FNBGX's 0.02% return.
RFBAX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 3.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 1.31%
- 10Y*
- 1.08%
FNBGX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.23%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- -1.23%
- 1Y
- 5.75%
- 3Y*
- -0.54%
- 5Y*
- -5.10%
- 10Y*
- —
RFBAX vs. FNBGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RFBAX Davis Government Bond Fund | 0.88% | 4.49% | 4.33% | 3.63% | -5.29% | -1.48% | 1.69% | 3.23% | 0.42% | -0.21% |
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 0.02% | 5.30% | -6.18% | 3.20% | -29.89% | -5.17% | 17.58% | 14.24% | -1.62% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between RFBAX and FNBGX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017 | 0.47 |
The correlation between RFBAX and FNBGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RFBAX vs. FNBGX — Risk / Return Rank
RFBAX
FNBGX
RFBAX vs. FNBGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) and Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RFBAX | FNBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 0.63 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.80 | 0.96 | +1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.11 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.85 | 0.78 | +4.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.20 | 2.06 | +17.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RFBAX | FNBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 0.63 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | -0.35 | +0.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | -0.07 | +1.12 |
Drawdowns
RFBAX vs. FNBGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RFBAX drawdown since its inception was -8.03%, smaller than the maximum FNBGX drawdown of -46.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFBAX and FNBGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RFBAX | FNBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.03% | -46.86% | +38.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.77% | -7.28% | +6.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.88% | -17.66% | +16.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.61% | -41.54% | +33.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -37.24% | +37.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -21.65% | +20.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.19% | 2.74% | -2.55% |
Volatility
RFBAX vs. FNBGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Davis Government Bond Fund (RFBAX) is 0.59%, while Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that RFBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNBGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RFBAX | FNBGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | 2.79% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | 6.13% | -4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90% | 9.03% | -7.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.10% | 14.59% | -12.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.79% | 14.20% | -12.41% |
RFBAX vs. FNBGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RFBAX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FNBGX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
RFBAX vs. FNBGX - Dividend Comparison
RFBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than FNBGX's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNBGX Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund | 4.00% | 3.88% | 3.75% | 3.20% | 2.26% | 2.47% | 3.96% | 2.63% | 2.93% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RFBAX Davis Government Bond Fund | 3.04% | 3.01% | 3.23% | 2.15% | 0.80% | 0.57% | 0.93% | 1.67% | 1.17% | 0.59% | 0.68% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RFBAX and FNBGX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNBGX has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to RFBAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFBAX dropped -8.03% vs FNBGX's -46.86%.
RFBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RFBAX and FNBGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer