PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNBGX vs. VGLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNBGX vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNBGX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than VGLT's 0.34% return.


FNBGX

1D
0.44%
1M
2.58%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.02%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
-0.39%
5Y*
-5.91%
10Y*

VGLT

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.89%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.36%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
-0.80%
5Y*
-5.58%
10Y*
-1.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNBGX vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNBGX
Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
0.79%5.30%-6.18%3.20%-29.89%-5.17%17.58%14.24%-1.62%1.86%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
0.34%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FNBGX and VGLT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2017

0.99

The correlation between FNBGX and VGLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNBGX vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNBGX
FNBGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FNBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FNBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNBGX vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNBGXVGLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.09

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

0.62

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.67

1.54

+0.13

FNBGX vs. VGLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNBGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the VGLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNBGX and VGLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNBGX vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNBGX drawdown since its inception was -46.86%, roughly equal to the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNBGX and VGLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNBGXVGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.86%

-46.18%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.28%

-7.01%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.66%

-17.68%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.54%

-40.98%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.76%

-36.35%

-0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.72%

-15.12%

-6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.81%

+0.07%

Volatility

FNBGX vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund (FNBGX) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) have volatilities of 2.10% and 2.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNBGXVGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

2.09%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.12%

6.08%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.68%

8.62%

+0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.55%

14.53%

+0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

13.82%

+0.35%

FNBGX vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNBGX and VGLT have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FNBGX vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison

FNBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than VGLT's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNBGX
Fidelity Long-Term Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.97%3.88%3.75%3.20%2.26%2.47%3.96%2.63%2.93%0.70%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.57%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FNBGX and VGLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNBGX has higher volatility (2.10%) compared to VGLT (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNBGX dropped -46.86% vs VGLT's -46.18%.

FNBGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNBGX and VGLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer