REZ vs. XFLT
REZ (iShares Residential Real Estate ETF) is REIT fund tracking the FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index, while XFLT (XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, REZ returned 4.39%/yr vs -4.53%/yr for XFLT. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
REZ vs. XFLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REZ achieves a 12.29% return, which is significantly higher than XFLT's -19.80% return.
REZ
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- 1Y
- 13.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 4.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
XFLT
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- -19.80%
- 6M
- -15.02%
- 1Y
- -26.28%
- 3Y*
- -4.75%
- 5Y*
- -4.53%
- 10Y*
- —
REZ vs. XFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF | 12.29% | 4.80% | 12.73% | 10.97% | -28.31% | 47.86% | -6.62% | 24.49% | 3.89% | -1.46% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | -19.80% | -15.35% | 7.37% | 30.40% | -20.30% | 31.30% | 5.13% | 22.05% | -15.10% | -4.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between REZ and XFLT is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.17 |
The correlation between REZ and XFLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REZ vs. XFLT — Risk / Return Rank
REZ
XFLT
REZ vs. XFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REZ | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.78 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | -0.65 | +2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | -1.34 | +6.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REZ vs. XFLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REZ drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, which is greater than XFLT's maximum drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REZ and XFLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REZ | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.87% | -55.43% | -11.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -40.67% | +31.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.39% | -47.04% | +28.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.05% | -47.04% | +11.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -36.23% | +36.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -14.43% | +1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 19.64% | -16.77% |
Volatility
REZ vs. XFLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust (XFLT) at 3.23%. This indicates that REZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REZ | XFLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 3.23% | +2.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.14% | 18.38% | -7.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 20.44% | -5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 21.11% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 26.14% | -4.59% |
Dividends
REZ vs. XFLT - Dividend Comparison
REZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than XFLT's 21.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REZ iShares Residential Real Estate ETF | 2.05% | 2.74% | 2.26% | 2.94% | 3.37% | 1.81% | 3.17% | 2.90% | 3.63% | 3.57% | 5.55% | 3.18% |
XFLT XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Term Trust | 21.19% | 18.23% | 15.24% | 13.61% | 13.86% | 9.82% | 10.64% | 10.63% | 11.33% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REZ and XFLT have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REZ has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to XFLT (3.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REZ dropped -66.87% vs XFLT's -55.43%.
REZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REZ and XFLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer