PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REZ vs. RWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REZ vs. RWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REZ achieves a 6.86% return, which is significantly higher than RWX's -3.34% return. Over the past 10 years, REZ has outperformed RWX with an annualized return of 6.37%, while RWX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.36% annualized return.


REZ

1D
0.48%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
6.86%
6M
3.65%
1Y
9.32%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
6.37%

RWX

1D
-1.01%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-3.34%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
3.84%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
-2.65%
10Y*
0.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REZ vs. RWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REZ
iShares Residential Real Estate ETF
6.86%4.80%12.73%10.97%-28.31%47.86%-6.62%24.49%3.89%3.87%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
-3.34%26.24%-12.15%6.25%-21.84%9.34%-9.03%19.88%-8.25%15.50%

Correlation

The correlation between REZ and RWX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2007

0.53

The correlation between REZ and RWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

REZ vs. RWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REZ
RWX

Real Estate

99.4%
60.5%

Financial Services

0.1%
2.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.2%

Healthcare

-

1.5%

Industrials

-

0.6%

Technology

-

2.7%

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

REZ
99.4%
RWX
60.5%

Financial Services

REZ
0.1%
RWX
2.8%

Basic Materials

REZ

-

RWX

-

Communication Services

REZ

-

RWX

-

Consumer Cyclical

REZ

-

RWX
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

REZ

-

RWX

-

Energy

REZ

-

RWX
1.2%

Healthcare

REZ

-

RWX
1.5%

Industrials

REZ

-

RWX
0.6%

Technology

REZ

-

RWX
2.7%

Utilities

REZ

-

RWX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REZ vs. RWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REZ
REZ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
REZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
REZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
REZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
REZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

RWX
RWX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REZ vs. RWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) and SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REZRWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.06

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

0.28

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

0.85

+2.42

REZ vs. RWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the RWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REZ and RWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REZRWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

0.29

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

-0.17

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.02

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.03

+0.21

Drawdowns

REZ vs. RWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REZ drawdown since its inception was -66.87%, smaller than the maximum RWX drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REZ and RWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REZRWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.87%

-73.62%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-13.58%

+4.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-19.05%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.05%

-35.91%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.15%

-43.37%

-0.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.21%

-14.76%

+10.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.69%

-20.30%

+7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

4.54%

-1.68%

Volatility

REZ vs. RWX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Residential Real Estate ETF (REZ) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF (RWX) at 4.07%. This indicates that REZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REZRWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

4.07%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

10.85%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

13.26%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

15.84%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.52%

16.49%

+5.03%

REZ vs. RWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

REZ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than RWX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

REZ vs. RWX - Dividend Comparison

REZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than RWX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REZ
iShares Residential Real Estate ETF
2.15%2.74%2.26%2.94%3.37%1.81%3.17%2.90%3.63%3.57%5.55%3.18%
RWX
SPDR DJ Wilshire International Real Estate ETF
3.78%3.65%4.32%3.90%4.05%4.62%2.92%8.94%5.28%2.77%8.74%2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


REZ and RWX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REZ has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to RWX (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REZ dropped -66.87% vs RWX's -73.62%.

On 10-year performance, REZ leads with 6.37% vs 0.36% for RWX. On fees, REZ is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, RWX has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REZ has performed better with a 6.37% return vs 0.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REZ is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for RWX.

RWX has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 2.15% for REZ.

REZ tracks FTSE NAREIT All Residential Capped Index, while RWX tracks Dow Jones Global ex-U.S. Real Estate Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for REZ and 0.59% for RWX.

REZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REZ and RWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer