REXC vs. INFR
REXC (Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REXC is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while INFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. REXC charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.
Performance
REXC vs. INFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
REXC
- 1D
- -5.32%
- 1M
- -17.09%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INFR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REXC vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF | -16.36% |
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REXC vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF (REXC) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REXC vs. INFR - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REXC | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.43% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | — | — |
Volatility
REXC vs. INFR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REXC | INFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.38% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.38% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.38% | — | — |
REXC vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
REXC has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
REXC vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison
Neither REXC nor INFR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF | 1.71% | 2.52% | 2.36% | 3.06% |
REXC Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, INFR is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
INFR is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for REXC.
INFR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.00% for REXC.
REXC is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while INFR is Energy Equities. REXC tracks Nasdaq Sprott Rare Earths Ex-China Index, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for REXC and 0.59% for INFR.
Find the right allocation for REXC and INFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer