GXPE vs. XLE
GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index while XLE tracks the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GXPE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
GXPE vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPE achieves a 21.27% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 22.58% return.
GXPE
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -8.52%
- YTD
- 21.27%
- 6M
- 22.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLE
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- -8.47%
- YTD
- 22.58%
- 6M
- 23.97%
- 1Y
- 26.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 18.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
GXPE vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 21.27% | 4.62% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 22.58% | 6.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPE and XLE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPE vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
GXPE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLE
GXPE vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPE vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPE drawdown since its inception was -14.89%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPE and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.89% | -71.26% | +56.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.91% | -12.96% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -17.97% | +14.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.66% | — |
Volatility
GXPE vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPE | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.71% | 20.96% | -0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 25.98% | -5.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 29.62% | -8.91% |
GXPE vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GXPE vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than XLE's 3.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.99% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 3.47% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, GXPE and XLE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPE.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 3.47%, compared with 0.99% for GXPE.
GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPE and 0.08% for XLE.
Find the right allocation for GXPE and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer