PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REW vs. XTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REW vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REW achieves a -48.44% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.36% return.


REW

1D
2.13%
1M
-32.71%
YTD
-48.44%
6M
-47.77%
1Y
-65.29%
3Y*
-47.19%
5Y*
-40.21%
10Y*
-45.16%

XTJL

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
YTD
5.36%
6M
6.38%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REW vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
REW
ProShares UltraShort Technology
-48.44%-43.15%-33.70%-61.35%65.72%-30.16%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
5.36%15.42%14.43%25.72%-15.66%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between REW and XTJL is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021

-0.85

The correlation between REW and XTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.85 to -0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REW vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REW
REW Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
REW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REW Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
REW Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
REW Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
REW Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

XTJL
XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REW vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REWXTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

1.46

-0.78

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

3.07

-4.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.00

17.37

-19.37

REW vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REW Sharpe Ratio is -1.56, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REW and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REWXTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.56

2.12

-3.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.79

0.65

-1.44

Drawdowns

REW vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REW drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REW and XTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REWXTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-23.24%

-76.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.25%

-5.12%

-61.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.76%

-16.70%

-70.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

0.00%

-99.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.88%

-4.04%

-82.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.60%

0.90%

+31.70%

Volatility

REW vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort Technology (REW) has a higher volatility of 14.84% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 0.33%. This indicates that REW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REWXTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.84%

0.33%

+14.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.14%

5.72%

+28.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.11%

7.43%

+34.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.64%

15.22%

+36.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.83%

15.22%

+33.61%

REW vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

REW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

REW vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

REW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
REW
ProShares UltraShort Technology
11.04%6.69%5.68%5.97%0.65%0.00%0.27%1.80%0.51%
XTJL
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REW and XTJL have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REW has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to XTJL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REW dropped -99.99% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

On 3-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.68% vs -47.19% for REW. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.68% return vs -47.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REW.

REW has the higher dividend yield at 11.04%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REW and 0.79% for XTJL.

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REW and XTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer