REVS vs. INCO
REVS (Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF) and INCO (Columbia India Consumer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REVS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index, while INCO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the Indxx India Consumer Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REVS returned 11.31%/yr vs 5.92%/yr for INCO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REVS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for INCO.
Performance
REVS vs. INCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REVS achieves a 12.59% return, which is significantly higher than INCO's -10.75% return.
REVS
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- 3.72%
- YTD
- 12.59%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- —
INCO
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- -10.75%
- 6M
- -9.88%
- 1Y
- -9.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
REVS vs. INCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 12.59% | 16.80% | 16.36% | 13.46% | -6.20% | 28.52% | 1.37% | 7.22% |
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | -10.75% | 0.59% | 12.70% | 34.63% | -7.01% | 19.28% | 14.55% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between REVS and INCO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.37 |
REVS vs. INCO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REVS
INCO
Financial Services
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
REVS
INCO
-
Technology
REVS
INCO
Healthcare
REVS
INCO
-
Industrials
REVS
INCO
Communication Services
REVS
INCO
-
Consumer Cyclical
REVS
INCO
Consumer Defensive
REVS
INCO
Energy
REVS
INCO
-
Utilities
REVS
INCO
-
Real Estate
REVS
INCO
-
Basic Materials
REVS
INCO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REVS vs. INCO — Risk / Return Rank
REVS
INCO
REVS vs. INCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) and Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REVS | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 0.92 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.08 | -0.44 | +4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.91 | -1.13 | +16.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REVS | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46 | -0.56 | +3.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.35 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.42 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
REVS vs. INCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REVS drawdown since its inception was -37.85%, smaller than the maximum INCO drawdown of -47.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REVS and INCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REVS | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.85% | -47.69% | +9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.94% | -21.37% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.37% | -29.98% | +13.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.04% | -29.98% | +11.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -24.00% | +24.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.66% | -10.58% | +5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 8.35% | -6.45% |
Volatility
REVS vs. INCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is 2.68%, while Columbia India Consumer ETF (INCO) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that REVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REVS | INCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.68% | 5.78% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.49% | 14.38% | -5.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.51% | 16.86% | -5.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 16.90% | -1.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 20.31% | -1.19% |
REVS vs. INCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
REVS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INCO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
REVS vs. INCO - Dividend Comparison
REVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, while INCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INCO Columbia India Consumer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.88% | 3.81% | 10.57% | 6.25% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.09% |
REVS Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | 1.89% | 2.13% | 1.89% | 2.49% | 2.46% | 1.18% | 27.75% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REVS and INCO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCO has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to REVS (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REVS dropped -37.85% vs INCO's -47.69%.
On 5-year performance, REVS leads with 11.31% vs 5.92% for INCO. On fees, REVS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, REVS has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, REVS has performed better with a 11.31% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REVS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for INCO.
REVS has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.00% for INCO.
REVS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INCO is Asia Pacific Equities. REVS tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index, while INCO tracks Indxx India Consumer Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for REVS and 0.75% for INCO.
REVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REVS and INCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer