PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RETL vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RETL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RETL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
-19.74%-5.98%-0.80%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
18.59%558.51%-40.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RETL achieves a -19.74% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 18.59% return.


RETL

1D
7.74%
1M
-21.94%
YTD
-19.74%
6M
-26.51%
1Y
21.54%
3Y*
1.20%
5Y*
-27.76%
10Y*
-6.00%

MULL

1D
9.98%
1M
-37.16%
YTD
18.59%
6M
194.62%
1Y
734.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RETL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

RETL has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RETL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RETL
RETL Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RETL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RETL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RETL Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
RETL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
RETL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RETL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RETLMULLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.30

5.72

-5.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.97

3.60

-2.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.48

-0.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

13.35

-12.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.56

37.78

-36.21

RETL vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RETL Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 5.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RETL and MULL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RETLMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

5.72

-5.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

1.62

-1.43

Correlation

The correlation between RETL and MULL is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

RETL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

RETL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, more than MULL's 0.33% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RETL
Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares
0.64%0.58%1.13%1.35%0.71%0.22%0.19%0.92%1.19%0.01%2.60%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
0.33%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RETL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RETL drawdown since its inception was -92.00%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RETL and MULL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RETLMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.00%

-72.29%

-19.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.89%

-53.09%

+15.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.22%

-48.41%

-37.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.02%

-21.94%

-15.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.73%

18.76%

-3.03%

Volatility

RETL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Retail Bull 3X Shares (RETL) is 17.46%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 47.04%. This indicates that RETL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RETLMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.46%

47.04%

-29.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.28%

98.50%

-55.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.49%

129.87%

-57.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.82%

129.40%

-49.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.57%

129.40%

-49.83%