RESM vs. CSB
RESM (Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF) and CSB (VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - RESM tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Small Cap Index while CSB tracks the Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RESM charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CSB.
Performance
RESM vs. CSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RESM achieves a 21.67% return, which is significantly higher than CSB's 13.81% return.
RESM
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 21.06%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSB
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- 6M
- 12.98%
- YTD
- 13.81%
- 1Y
- 18.07%
- 3Y*
- 12.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.24%
RESM vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 21.67% | -3.32% |
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 13.81% | -1.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between RESM and CSB is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RESM vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank
RESM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CSB
RESM vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF (RESM) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RESM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.59 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RESM vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RESM drawdown since its inception was -8.50%, smaller than the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RESM and CSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RESM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.50% | -42.07% | +33.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.95% | -0.32% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.77% | -7.09% | +5.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.48% | — |
Volatility
RESM vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RESM | CSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.70% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.36% | 14.19% | +3.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 18.69% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.36% | 21.27% | -3.91% |
RESM vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RESM has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than CSB's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RESM vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison
RESM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than CSB's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSB VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF | 3.15% | 3.54% | 3.12% | 3.45% | 3.60% | 3.11% | 3.70% | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.19% | 2.85% | 1.57% |
RESM Columbia Research Enhanced Small Cap ETF | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RESM and CSB have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RESM is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RESM is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CSB.
CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.08% for RESM.
RESM tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Small Cap Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for RESM and 0.35% for CSB.
Find the right allocation for RESM and CSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer