REMX vs. NUKZ

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) and NUKZ (Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REMX is a Materials fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while NUKZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, REMX returned 129.60% vs 31.62% for NUKZ. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for NUKZ.

Performance

REMX vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 18.26% return, which is significantly higher than NUKZ's 7.72% return.

REMX

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -17.82%
• YTD: 18.26%
• 6M: 21.26%
• 1Y: 129.60%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: 3.01%
• 10Y*: 9.04%

NUKZ

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -6.54%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 6M: 3.81%
• 1Y: 31.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REMX vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	18.26%	92.95%	-19.76%
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	7.72%	56.57%	62.98%

Correlation

The correlation between REMX and NUKZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.44

REMX vs. NUKZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REMX	NUKZ
Basic Materials	100.0%	4.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	12.9%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	45.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.4%
Utilities	-	35.8%

Return for Risk

REMX vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 82
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

NUKZ

NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 34
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REMX vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REMX	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	1.05	+1.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	1.59	+1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.19	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.58	1.92	+3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.61	4.79	+10.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REMX vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REMX and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REMX	NUKZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	1.05	+1.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.10	1.63	-1.73

Drawdowns

REMX vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and NUKZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	REMX	NUKZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.20%	-33.03%	-57.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.35%	-16.51%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.34%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-73.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-59.97%	-10.27%	-49.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.86%	-6.02%	-60.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.34%	6.62%	+1.72%

Volatility

REMX vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a higher volatility of 14.39% compared to Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) at 10.20%. This indicates that REMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REMX	NUKZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.39%	10.20%	+4.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.93%	22.61%	+13.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	48.92%	30.26%	+18.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.41%	32.82%	+7.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.04%	32.82%	+4.22%

REMX vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

REMX vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than NUKZ's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF	0.85%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	1.49%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REMX and NUKZ in my portfolio?

REMX and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REMX or NUKZ?

REMX has higher volatility (14.39%) compared to NUKZ (10.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REMX dropped -90.20% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

Which ETF is better, REMX or NUKZ?

On 1-year performance, REMX leads with 129.60% vs 31.62% for NUKZ. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, NUKZ has been the lower-risk option at 10.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REMX or NUKZ?

Over the 1-year period, REMX has performed better with a 129.60% return vs 31.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REMX or NUKZ?

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REMX or NUKZ?

REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.85% for NUKZ.

What is the main difference between REMX and NUKZ?

REMX is categorized as Materials, while NUKZ is Energy Equities. REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while NUKZ tracks Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.85% for NUKZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.