REMX vs. FMTL
REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) and FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) are both Rare Earth & Strategic Metals funds - REMX tracks the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index while FMTL tracks the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REMX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FMTL.
Performance
REMX vs. FMTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX achieves a 24.22% return, which is significantly higher than FMTL's 16.73% return.
REMX
- 1D
- -5.62%
- 1M
- -5.16%
- YTD
- 24.22%
- 6M
- 22.61%
- 1Y
- 139.49%
- 3Y*
- 5.61%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
FMTL
- 1D
- -4.50%
- 1M
- -5.43%
- YTD
- 16.73%
- 6M
- 15.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REMX vs. FMTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 24.22% | 17.55% |
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 16.73% | 21.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX and FMTL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX vs. FMTL — Risk / Return Rank
REMX
FMTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
REMX vs. FMTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) and First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REMX | FMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.83 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REMX vs. FMTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX drawdown since its inception was -90.20%, which is greater than FMTL's maximum drawdown of -22.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX and FMTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX | FMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.20% | -22.44% | -67.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.95% | -12.48% | -45.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.82% | -5.34% | -61.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.85% | — | — |
Volatility
REMX vs. FMTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX | FMTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.97% | 40.43% | +9.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.71% | 40.43% | +0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.16% | 40.43% | -3.27% |
REMX vs. FMTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX vs. FMTL - Dividend Comparison
REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than FMTL's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF | 1.42% | 1.76% | 2.56% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 5.25% | 0.81% | 1.64% | 12.43% | 2.89% | 2.23% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX and FMTL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.
REMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.05% for FMTL.
REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX and 0.65% for FMTL.
Find the right allocation for REMX and FMTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer