REMX.L vs. ZINC.L
REMX.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A USD (Acc)) and ZINC.L (WisdomTree Zinc) are both Metals funds - REMX.L tracks the MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index while ZINC.L tracks the Bloomberg Zinc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, REMX.L returned -5.20%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for ZINC.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. REMX.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ZINC.L.
Performance
REMX.L vs. ZINC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMX.L achieves a -2.56% return, which is significantly lower than ZINC.L's 14.39% return.
REMX.L
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- -26.89%
- 6M
- -19.33%
- YTD
- -2.56%
- 1Y
- 49.63%
- 3Y*
- -5.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZINC.L
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- 6M
- 11.03%
- YTD
- 14.39%
- 1Y
- 35.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
REMX.L vs. ZINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMX.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) | -2.56% | 88.79% | -35.65% | -18.38% | -30.93% | 7.28% |
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 14.39% | 6.77% | 13.03% | -8.97% | -11.08% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMX.L and ZINC.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMX.L vs. ZINC.L — Risk / Return Rank
REMX.L
ZINC.L
REMX.L vs. ZINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) (REMX.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REMX.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.29 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.26 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.46 | 11.55 | -7.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REMX.L vs. ZINC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMX.L drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than ZINC.L's maximum drawdown of -65.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMX.L and ZINC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMX.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.21% | -65.88% | -7.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.86% | -10.74% | -24.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.13% | -19.40% | -40.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.93% | -12.37% | -29.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -38.22% | -3.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.09% | 3.03% | +8.06% |
Volatility
REMX.L vs. ZINC.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A USD (Acc) (REMX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.57% compared to WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) at 7.90%. This indicates that REMX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMX.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.57% | 7.90% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.30% | 14.64% | +19.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.11% | 19.60% | +27.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.72% | 25.49% | +29.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.72% | 24.06% | +30.66% |
REMX.L vs. ZINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMX.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ZINC.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMX.L vs. ZINC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither REMX.L nor ZINC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
REMX.L and ZINC.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZINC.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZINC.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for REMX.L.
REMX.L tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index, while ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REMX.L and 0.49% for ZINC.L.
Find the right allocation for REMX.L and ZINC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer