REMC vs. VXF
REMC (Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) and VXF (Vanguard Extended Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - REMC tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Mid Cap Index while VXF tracks the S&P Completion Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REMC charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXF.
Performance
REMC vs. VXF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REMC achieves a 12.94% return, which is significantly lower than VXF's 15.17% return.
REMC
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 9.02%
- YTD
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXF
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 8.83%
- YTD
- 15.17%
- 1Y
- 23.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
REMC vs. VXF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 12.94% | -1.99% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 15.17% | -2.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between REMC and VXF is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REMC vs. VXF — Risk / Return Rank
REMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VXF
REMC vs. VXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REMC | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.30 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REMC vs. VXF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REMC drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum VXF drawdown of -58.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REMC and VXF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REMC | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -58.03% | +51.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.71% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -9.52% | +8.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.92% | — |
Volatility
REMC vs. VXF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REMC | VXF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 17.71% | -5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.09% | 22.42% | -10.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.09% | 22.26% | -10.17% |
REMC vs. VXF - Expense Ratio Comparison
REMC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than VXF's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
REMC vs. VXF - Dividend Comparison
REMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than VXF's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REMC Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 0.07% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXF Vanguard Extended Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.27% | 1.15% | 1.13% | 1.07% | 1.30% | 1.66% | 1.25% | 1.43% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REMC and VXF have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for REMC.
VXF has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.07% for REMC.
REMC tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced Mid Cap Index, while VXF tracks S&P Completion Index. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for REMC and 0.05% for VXF.
Find the right allocation for REMC and VXF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer