RELX vs. TRI
Compare and contrast key facts about RELX PLC (RELX) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI).
Performance
RELX vs. TRI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RELX vs. TRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELX RELX PLC | -17.99% | -9.60% | 16.59% | 46.09% | -13.06% | 35.47% | 0.27% | 25.28% | -11.20% | 34.97% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | -31.26% | -16.57% | 11.14% | 30.31% | -3.01% | 49.18% | 16.71% | 51.59% | 14.56% | 2.68% |
Fundamentals
RELX:
$60.78B
TRI:
$40.09B
RELX:
$2.17
TRI:
$3.34
RELX:
15.27
TRI:
26.90
RELX:
3.21
TRI:
5.31
RELX:
25.73
TRI:
3.37
RELX:
$18.99B
TRI:
$7.61B
RELX:
$12.35B
TRI:
$2.00B
RELX:
$6.05B
TRI:
$2.34B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RELX achieves a -17.99% return, which is significantly higher than TRI's -31.26% return. Over the past 10 years, RELX has underperformed TRI with an annualized return of 8.20%, while TRI has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.
RELX
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -4.71%
- YTD
- -17.99%
- 6M
- -30.59%
- 1Y
- -33.20%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
TRI
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- -31.26%
- 6M
- -41.38%
- 1Y
- -46.95%
- 3Y*
- -10.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RELX vs. TRI — Risk / Return Rank
RELX
TRI
RELX vs. TRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RELX PLC (RELX) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RELX | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | -1.25 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | -1.91 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 0.74 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.66 | -0.75 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -1.47 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RELX | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | -1.25 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.08 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | 0.48 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.31 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between RELX and TRI is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RELX vs. TRI - Dividend Comparison
RELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than TRI's 2.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELX RELX PLC | 2.48% | 2.03% | 1.68% | 1.73% | 2.42% | 2.05% | 2.39% | 1.57% | 2.68% | 2.05% | 2.55% | 2.28% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | 2.71% | 1.80% | 1.35% | 4.68% | 1.56% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.87% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
Drawdowns
RELX vs. TRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RELX drawdown since its inception was -49.91%, smaller than the maximum TRI drawdown of -61.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RELX and TRI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RELX | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.91% | -61.67% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.91% | -61.67% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.91% | -61.67% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.91% | -61.67% | +11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.12% | -57.34% | +17.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.13% | -11.19% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.69% | 31.50% | -8.81% |
Volatility
RELX vs. TRI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RELX PLC (RELX) is 7.46%, while Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that RELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RELX | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.46% | 13.46% | -6.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.30% | 32.25% | -6.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.39% | 37.73% | -7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 24.02% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 22.55% | -0.42% |
Financials
RELX vs. TRI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RELX PLC and Thomson Reuters Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities