RELX vs. TRI
RELX (RELX PLC) and TRI (Thomson Reuters Corp) are both stocks. RELX operates in Publishing (Communication Services), while TRI operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, RELX returned 8.18%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for TRI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RELX vs. TRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RELX achieves a -21.27% return, which is significantly higher than TRI's -37.89% return. Over the past 10 years, RELX has underperformed TRI with an annualized return of 8.18%, while TRI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.
RELX
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- -21.27%
- 6M
- -22.63%
- 1Y
- -39.76%
- 3Y*
- 0.12%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
TRI
- 1D
- 5.43%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -37.89%
- 6M
- -38.43%
- 1Y
- -57.85%
- 3Y*
- -14.04%
- 5Y*
- -2.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
RELX vs. TRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELX RELX PLC | -21.27% | -9.60% | 16.59% | 46.09% | -13.06% | 35.47% | 0.27% | 25.28% | -11.20% | 34.97% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | -37.89% | -16.57% | 11.14% | 30.31% | -3.01% | 49.18% | 16.71% | 51.59% | 14.56% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between RELX and TRI is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2002 | 0.45 |
The correlation between RELX and TRI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
RELX:
$57.22B
TRI:
$35.33B
RELX:
£2.17
TRI:
$3.42
RELX:
10.86
TRI:
23.60
RELX:
2.28
TRI:
4.70
RELX:
18.30
TRI:
2.98
RELX:
£18.99B
TRI:
$7.66B
RELX:
£12.35B
TRI:
$4.11B
RELX:
£6.05B
TRI:
$3.11B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RELX vs. TRI — Risk / Return Rank
RELX
TRI
RELX vs. TRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RELX PLC (RELX) and Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RELX | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.76 | 0.71 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | -0.91 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | -1.38 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RELX vs. TRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RELX drawdown since its inception was -49.91%, smaller than the maximum TRI drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RELX and TRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RELX | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.91% | -63.45% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.70% | -63.45% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.91% | -63.45% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.91% | -63.45% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.91% | -63.45% | +13.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.52% | -61.46% | +18.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -11.63% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.44% | 42.04% | -14.60% |
Volatility
RELX vs. TRI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RELX PLC (RELX) is 11.01%, while Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a volatility of 15.99%. This indicates that RELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RELX | TRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.01% | 15.99% | -4.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.07% | 38.17% | -10.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.98% | 43.22% | -12.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 26.16% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 23.69% | -1.28% |
Dividends
RELX vs. TRI - Dividend Comparison
RELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than TRI's 4.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RELX RELX PLC | 2.95% | 2.03% | 1.68% | 1.73% | 2.42% | 2.05% | 2.39% | 1.57% | 2.68% | 2.05% | 2.55% | 2.28% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | 4.91% | 1.80% | 1.35% | 4.68% | 1.56% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.87% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
Financials
RELX vs. TRI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between RELX PLC and Thomson Reuters Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RELX vs. TRI - Profitability Comparison
RELX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RELX PLC reported a gross profit of 3.07B and revenue of 4.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.
TRI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a gross profit of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.
RELX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RELX PLC reported an operating income of 1.51B and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.4%.
TRI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported an operating income of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.6%.
RELX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RELX PLC reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 4.82B, resulting in a net margin of 22.5%.
TRI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a net income of 452.64M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RELX and TRI have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRI has higher volatility (15.99%) compared to RELX (11.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RELX dropped -49.91% vs TRI's -63.45%.
RELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.29 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RELX and TRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer