REK vs. SCHH
REK (ProShares Short Real Estate) and SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) are both REIT funds - REK tracks the DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%) while SCHH tracks the Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REK returned -6.39%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for SCHH. At a correlation of -0.95, they often move in opposite directions. REK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SCHH.
Performance
REK vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REK achieves a -8.01% return, which is significantly lower than SCHH's 12.96% return. Over the past 10 years, REK has underperformed SCHH with an annualized return of -6.39%, while SCHH has yielded a comparatively higher 4.28% annualized return.
REK
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- -8.01%
- 6M
- -7.17%
- 1Y
- -4.03%
- 3Y*
- -4.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.45%
- 10Y*
- -6.39%
SCHH
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 0.69%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 12.23%
- 1Y
- 13.99%
- 3Y*
- 10.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.28%
REK vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REK ProShares Short Real Estate | -8.01% | 2.35% | 1.42% | -6.61% | 29.17% | -30.58% | -11.33% | -20.96% | 4.61% | -9.34% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 12.96% | 2.20% | 4.99% | 11.18% | -24.99% | 41.07% | -14.81% | 22.85% | -4.26% | 3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between REK and SCHH is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.98 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2011 | -0.95 |
The correlation between REK and SCHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
REK vs. SCHH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REK
SCHH
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
REK
SCHH
Basic Materials
REK
-
SCHH
Communication Services
REK
-
SCHH
-
Consumer Cyclical
REK
-
SCHH
-
Consumer Defensive
REK
-
SCHH
-
Energy
REK
-
SCHH
-
Healthcare
REK
-
SCHH
-
Industrials
REK
-
SCHH
-
Real Estate
REK
-
SCHH
Technology
REK
-
SCHH
-
Utilities
REK
-
SCHH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REK vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank
REK
SCHH
REK vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REK | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.19 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 1.70 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | 5.34 | -6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REK | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 1.06 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.18 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.32 | 0.20 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.49 | 0.34 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
REK vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REK drawdown since its inception was -84.57%, which is greater than SCHH's maximum drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REK and SCHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REK | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.57% | -44.22% | -40.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.23% | -8.28% | -1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.93% | -17.76% | -9.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.93% | -33.28% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.67% | -44.22% | -14.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.22% | -1.55% | -80.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.08% | -9.45% | -54.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 2.63% | +1.83% |
Volatility
REK vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Real Estate (REK) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) have volatilities of 4.22% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REK | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 4.17% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.78% | 9.61% | +0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.51% | 13.27% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.87% | 18.72% | +0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.30% | 20.97% | -0.67% |
REK vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
REK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
REK vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
REK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than SCHH's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REK ProShares Short Real Estate | 3.32% | 3.43% | 6.22% | 4.50% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 1.28% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.77% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REK and SCHH have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REK has higher volatility (4.22%) compared to SCHH (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REK dropped -84.57% vs SCHH's -44.22%.
On 10-year performance, SCHH leads with 4.28% vs -6.39% for REK. On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHH has performed better with a 4.28% return vs -6.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for REK.
REK has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 2.77% for SCHH.
REK tracks DJ Global United States (All) / Real Estate -SS (-100%), while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for REK and 0.07% for SCHH.
SCHH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REK and SCHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer