PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REIT vs. SMTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REIT vs. SMTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REIT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than SMTH's 0.55% return.


REIT

1D
0.54%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
12.74%
6M
12.18%
1Y
13.01%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
4.38%
10Y*

SMTH

1D
0.07%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REIT vs. SMTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
12.74%-0.55%7.11%7.59%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
0.55%6.86%2.76%3.49%

Correlation

The correlation between REIT and SMTH is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023

0.38

REIT vs. SMTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REIT
SMTH

Real Estate

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

REIT
100.0%
SMTH

-

Basic Materials

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Communication Services

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Consumer Cyclical

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Consumer Defensive

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Energy

REIT

-

SMTH
100.0%

Financial Services

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Healthcare

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Industrials

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Technology

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Utilities

REIT

-

SMTH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REIT vs. SMTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REIT
REIT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
REIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
REIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
REIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
REIT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SMTH
SMTH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SMTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMTH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SMTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMTH Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REIT vs. SMTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) and ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REITSMTHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

1.42

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

2.18

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.25

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.88

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.26

5.71

-0.45

REIT vs. SMTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is comparable to the SMTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REIT and SMTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REITSMTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

1.42

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.21

-0.82

Drawdowns

REIT vs. SMTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REIT drawdown since its inception was -29.30%, which is greater than SMTH's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REIT and SMTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REITSMTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.30%

-4.11%

-25.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.35%

-2.74%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-1.20%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.39%

-1.05%

-9.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

0.91%

+1.62%

Volatility

REIT vs. SMTH - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Active REIT ETF (REIT) has a higher volatility of 3.88% compared to ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF (SMTH) at 1.32%. This indicates that REIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REITSMTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

1.32%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.08%

2.69%

+6.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.78%

3.89%

+8.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.45%

4.59%

+13.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

4.59%

+13.79%

REIT vs. SMTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

REIT has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SMTH's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

REIT vs. SMTH - Dividend Comparison

REIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than SMTH's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
REIT
ALPS Active REIT ETF
2.80%3.20%3.06%3.13%2.81%4.71%
SMTH
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
4.39%4.46%4.58%0.24%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


REIT and SMTH have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REIT has higher volatility (3.88%) compared to SMTH (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REIT dropped -29.30% vs SMTH's -4.11%.

On 1-year performance, REIT leads with 13.01% vs 5.50% for SMTH. On fees, SMTH is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, SMTH has been the lower-risk option at 1.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, REIT has performed better with a 13.01% return vs 5.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMTH is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for REIT.

SMTH has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 2.80% for REIT.

REIT is categorized as REIT, while SMTH is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for REIT and 0.59% for SMTH.

SMTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REIT and SMTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer