PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGL vs. PEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGL vs. PEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 13.59% return, which is significantly lower than PEY's 23.42% return. Over the past 10 years, REGL has outperformed PEY with an annualized return of 9.68%, while PEY has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.


REGL

1D
0.94%
1M
2.48%
6M
7.93%
YTD
13.59%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
9.68%
ALL TIME*
10.08%

PEY

1D
1.35%
1M
3.57%
6M
15.13%
YTD
23.42%
1Y
26.07%
3Y*
11.62%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
9.03%
ALL TIME*
6.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.27M$5.03M$4.84M
$11.70M$8.88M$5.98M

REGL vs. PEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
13.59%6.89%12.26%5.41%-0.62%20.38%7.50%18.79%-3.25%10.17%
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
23.42%0.56%5.25%7.29%2.45%26.15%-3.85%24.76%-7.49%8.78%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and PEY is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015

0.86

The correlation between REGL and PEY shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REGL vs. PEY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REGL
PEY

Financial Services

32.0%
22.0%

Industrials

15.5%
15.5%

Utilities

13.4%
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.1%

Basic Materials

8.7%
4.0%

Real Estate

7.6%

-

Healthcare

4.6%
4.2%

Energy

3.1%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
20.0%

Technology

1.7%
2.6%

Communication Services

-

5.3%

Financial Services

REGL
32.0%
PEY
22.0%

Industrials

REGL
15.5%
PEY
15.5%

Utilities

REGL
13.4%
PEY
14.0%

Consumer Cyclical

REGL
10.7%
PEY
7.1%

Basic Materials

REGL
8.7%
PEY
4.0%

Real Estate

REGL
7.6%
PEY

-

Healthcare

REGL
4.6%
PEY
4.2%

Energy

REGL
3.1%
PEY
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

REGL
2.6%
PEY
20.0%

Technology

REGL
1.7%
PEY
2.6%

Communication Services

REGL

-

PEY
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGL vs. PEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REGL
REGL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PEY
PEY Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEY Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REGL vs. PEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGLPEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.95

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.06

8.62

-2.56

REGL vs. PEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the PEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and PEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGL vs. PEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, smaller than the maximum PEY drawdown of -72.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and PEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGLPEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.37%

-72.81%

+36.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.88%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-17.90%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-17.90%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

-41.55%

+5.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-1.45%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-12.78%

+8.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

3.03%

+0.06%

Volatility

REGL vs. PEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) is 4.17%, while Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that REGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGLPEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

5.31%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

9.96%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.11%

14.28%

-1.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

16.46%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.32%

18.92%

-0.60%

REGL vs. PEY - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PEY's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGL vs. PEY - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than PEY's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEY
Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF
4.20%4.85%4.44%4.58%4.22%3.83%4.30%3.78%4.33%3.21%3.12%3.44%
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.15%2.32%2.28%2.40%2.32%2.50%2.41%1.96%2.09%1.63%1.20%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGL and PEY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PEY has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to REGL (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs PEY's -72.81%.

On 10-year performance, REGL leads with 9.68% vs 9.03% for PEY. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, REGL has performed better with a 9.68% return vs 9.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for PEY.

PEY has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 2.15% for REGL.

REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while PEY tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.54% for PEY.

PEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGL and PEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer