REGL vs. PEY
REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and PEY (Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - REGL tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index while PEY tracks the NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REGL returned 9.34%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for PEY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for PEY.
Performance
REGL vs. PEY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly lower than PEY's 19.30% return. Over the past 10 years, REGL has outperformed PEY with an annualized return of 9.34%, while PEY has yielded a comparatively lower 8.58% annualized return.
REGL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
PEY
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 15.26%
- YTD
- 19.30%
- 1Y
- 17.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
REGL vs. PEY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 10.33% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.62% | 20.38% | 7.50% | 18.79% | -3.25% | 10.17% |
PEY Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 19.30% | 0.56% | 5.25% | 7.29% | 2.45% | 26.15% | -3.85% | 24.76% | -7.49% | 8.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGL and PEY is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015 | 0.86 |
The correlation between REGL and PEY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
REGL vs. PEY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REGL
PEY
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
REGL
PEY
Industrials
REGL
PEY
Utilities
REGL
PEY
Consumer Cyclical
REGL
PEY
Basic Materials
REGL
PEY
Real Estate
REGL
PEY
-
Healthcare
REGL
PEY
Energy
REGL
PEY
Consumer Defensive
REGL
PEY
Technology
REGL
PEY
Communication Services
REGL
-
PEY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGL vs. PEY — Risk / Return Rank
REGL
PEY
REGL vs. PEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REGL | PEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.97 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 5.54 | -1.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGL vs. PEY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, smaller than the maximum PEY drawdown of -72.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and PEY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGL | PEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -72.81% | +36.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -8.88% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.96% | -17.90% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -17.90% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.37% | -41.55% | +5.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.39% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -12.82% | +8.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.16% | -0.05% |
Volatility
REGL vs. PEY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) is 3.43%, while Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PEY) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that REGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGL | PEY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 4.63% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 9.67% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 14.04% | -0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 16.38% | -0.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 18.87% | -0.58% |
REGL vs. PEY - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PEY's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGL vs. PEY - Dividend Comparison
REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than PEY's 4.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEY Invesco High Yield Equity Dividend Achievers™ ETF | 4.29% | 4.85% | 4.44% | 4.58% | 4.22% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.78% | 4.33% | 3.21% | 3.12% | 3.44% |
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.21% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGL and PEY have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEY has higher volatility (4.63%) compared to REGL (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs PEY's -72.81%.
On 10-year performance, REGL leads with 9.34% vs 8.58% for PEY. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, REGL has performed better with a 9.34% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for PEY.
PEY has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 2.21% for REGL.
REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while PEY tracks NASDAQ US Dividend Achievers 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.54% for PEY.
PEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REGL and PEY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer