REGL vs. IWMW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and IWMW (iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while IWMW is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, REGL returned 9.25% vs 24.62% for IWMW. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IWMW.

Performance

REGL vs. IWMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than IWMW's 8.49% return.

REGL

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -2.06%
• YTD: 3.98%
• 6M: 4.90%
• 1Y: 9.25%
• 3Y*: 10.42%
• 5Y*: 5.92%
• 10Y*: 9.12%

IWMW

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 3.04%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 6M: 8.94%
• 1Y: 24.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGL vs. IWMW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	3.98%	6.89%	8.96%
IWMW iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF	8.49%	7.82%	6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and IWMW is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	0.69

The correlation between REGL and IWMW shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REGL vs. IWMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REGL	IWMW
Financial Services	30.0%	16.0%
Industrials	15.1%	17.6%
Utilities	14.5%	3.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	7.8%
Basic Materials	9.3%	4.8%
Real Estate	7.8%	5.8%
Healthcare	4.5%	16.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	2.2%
Energy	3.4%	6.4%
Technology	2.0%	19.2%
Communication Services	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

REGL vs. IWMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGL

REGL Risk / Return Rank: 21
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 23

IWMW

IWMW Risk / Return Rank: 64
IWMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
IWMW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IWMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
IWMW Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGL vs. IWMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REGL	IWMW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	2.01	-1.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.13	2.75	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.40	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	3.56	-2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.07	12.33	-9.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REGL vs. IWMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the IWMW Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and IWMW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REGL	IWMW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	2.01	-1.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.64	-0.11

Drawdowns

REGL vs. IWMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than IWMW's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and IWMW.

Drawdown Indicators

	REGL	IWMW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.37%	-21.82%	-14.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-6.94%	-2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.82%	-0.34%	-5.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-3.85%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	2.00%	+1.02%

Volatility

REGL vs. IWMW - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF (IWMW) at 3.03%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REGL	IWMW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	3.03%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.23%	8.75%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.22%	12.32%	+0.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.11%	16.12%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.33%	16.12%	+2.21%

REGL vs. IWMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IWMW's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

REGL vs. IWMW - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than IWMW's 22.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWMW iShares Russell 2000 BuyWrite ETF	22.40%	20.98%	17.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.24%	2.32%	2.28%	2.40%	2.32%	2.50%	2.41%	1.96%	2.09%	1.63%	1.20%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REGL and IWMW in my portfolio?

REGL and IWMW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REGL or IWMW?

REGL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to IWMW (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs IWMW's -21.82%.

Which ETF is better, REGL or IWMW?

On 1-year performance, IWMW leads with 24.62% vs 9.25% for REGL. On fees, IWMW is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IWMW has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REGL or IWMW?

Over the 1-year period, IWMW has performed better with a 24.62% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REGL or IWMW?

IWMW is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REGL or IWMW?

IWMW has the higher dividend yield at 22.40%, compared with 2.24% for REGL.

What is the main difference between REGL and IWMW?

REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while IWMW is Derivative Income. REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while IWMW tracks Cboe FTSE Russell IWM 2% OTM BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.39% for IWMW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.