REGB.L vs. LIT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

REGB.L (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A) and LIT (Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REGB.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while LIT is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Lithium Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, REGB.L returned 3.20%/yr vs 7.95%/yr for LIT. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REGB.L charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LIT.

Performance

REGB.L vs. LIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

REGB.L is traded in GBP, while LIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LIT values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGB.L achieves a 31.29% return, which is significantly higher than LIT's 28.92% return.

REGB.L

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -6.24%
• YTD: 31.29%
• 6M: 38.96%
• 1Y: 162.45%
• 3Y*: 3.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LIT

• 1D: -1.86%
• 1M: -4.98%
• YTD: 28.92%
• 6M: 33.26%
• 1Y: 127.64%
• 3Y*: 7.95%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 15.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGB.L vs. LIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	31.29%	75.67%	-34.55%	-22.78%	-22.89%	14.56%
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	28.92%	48.64%	-17.78%	-16.57%	-21.58%	5.25%

Correlation

The correlation between REGB.L and LIT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021	0.63

The correlation between REGB.L and LIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

REGB.L vs. LIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGB.L

REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 89
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

LIT

LIT Risk / Return Rank: 93
LIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
LIT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
LIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LIT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGB.L vs. LIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) and Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	REGB.L	LIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.58	4.12	-0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	4.54	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.60	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.71	10.96	-3.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.77	38.05	-17.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

REGB.L vs. LIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.58, which is comparable to the LIT Sharpe Ratio of 4.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGB.L and LIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	REGB.L	LIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.58	4.12	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.31	-0.30

Drawdowns

REGB.L vs. LIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGB.L drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, which is greater than LIT's maximum drawdown of -64.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGB.L and LIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	REGB.L	LIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.41%	-64.16%	-8.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.93%	-11.71%	-9.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-60.97%	-51.92%	-9.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-64.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.30%	-10.15%	-13.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.12%	-30.83%	-9.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.79%	3.37%	+4.42%

Volatility

REGB.L vs. LIT - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) has a higher volatility of 13.31% compared to Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF (LIT) at 7.71%. This indicates that REGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REGB.L	LIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.31%	7.71%	+5.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.52%	20.17%	+11.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.11%	31.23%	+13.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.61%	29.93%	+14.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.61%	29.42%	+15.19%

REGB.L vs. LIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGB.L has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than LIT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

REGB.L vs. LIT - Dividend Comparison

REGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIT Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF	0.38%	0.49%	0.93%	1.11%	0.99%	0.22%	0.40%	1.85%	2.52%	3.26%	2.15%	0.24%
REGB.L VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REGB.L and LIT in my portfolio?

REGB.L and LIT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, REGB.L or LIT?

On fees, REGB.L is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REGB.L or LIT?

REGB.L is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for LIT.

What is the main difference between REGB.L and LIT?

REGB.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while LIT is Commodity Producers Equities. REGB.L tracks EMIX Global Mining Global Gold TR USD, while LIT tracks Solactive Global Lithium Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for REGB.L and 0.75% for LIT.