REFA vs. IFLO

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

REFA (Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF) and IFLO (VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REFA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for IFLO.

Performance

REFA vs. IFLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REFA achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly lower than IFLO's 18.95% return.

REFA

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 2.81%
• 6M: 9.75%
• YTD: 11.14%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IFLO

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: -0.30%
• 6M: 18.27%
• YTD: 18.95%
• 1Y: 31.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REFA vs. IFLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
REFA Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF	11.14%	0.33%
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	18.95%	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between REFA and IFLO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

REFA vs. IFLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REFA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

IFLO

IFLO Risk / Return Rank: 86
IFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
IFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
IFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REFA vs. IFLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) and VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF (IFLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REFA	IFLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.16	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.11	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.70	—

Drawdowns

REFA vs. IFLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REFA drawdown since its inception was -11.23%, which is greater than IFLO's maximum drawdown of -6.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REFA and IFLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	REFA	IFLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.23%	-6.44%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.36%	-1.70%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.79%	-1.28%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	REFA	IFLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.01%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.61%	14.78%	+3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.61%	14.70%	+3.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.61%	14.70%	+3.91%

REFA vs. IFLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

REFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than IFLO's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

REFA vs. IFLO - Dividend Comparison

REFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than IFLO's 1.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
IFLO VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF	1.48%	0.73%
REFA Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF	0.03%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REFA and IFLO in my portfolio?

REFA and IFLO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, REFA or IFLO?

On fees, REFA is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, REFA or IFLO?

REFA is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for IFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REFA or IFLO?

IFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 0.03% for REFA.

What is the main difference between REFA and IFLO?

They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for REFA and 0.56% for IFLO.