PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REFA vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REFA vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REFA achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 10.30% return.


REFA

1D
1.35%
1M
2.81%
6M
9.75%
YTD
11.14%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BKIE

1D
1.31%
1M
1.69%
6M
9.46%
YTD
10.30%
1Y
21.69%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
9.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REFA vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between REFA and BKIE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REFA vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REFA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REFA vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REFABKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.32

REFA vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REFA vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REFA drawdown since its inception was -11.23%, smaller than the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REFA and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REFABKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.23%

-28.19%

+16.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-4.93%

+2.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

Volatility

REFA vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REFABKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.61%

15.14%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

16.22%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.61%

16.35%

+2.26%

REFA vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

REFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

REFA vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

REFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BKIE's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.19%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%
REFA
Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF
0.03%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, REFA and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for REFA.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.03% for REFA.

REFA tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced International Equity Index, while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for REFA and 0.04% for BKIE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REFA and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer