REFA vs. BKIE
REFA (Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - REFA tracks the Beta Advantage Research Enhanced International Equity Index while BKIE tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. REFA charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
REFA vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REFA achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 10.30% return.
REFA
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 1.69%
- 6M
- 9.46%
- YTD
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 21.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- —
REFA vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
REFA Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF | 11.14% | 0.33% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 10.30% | 1.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between REFA and BKIE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REFA vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
REFA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BKIE
REFA vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF (REFA) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REFA | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.91 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REFA vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REFA drawdown since its inception was -11.23%, smaller than the maximum BKIE drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REFA and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REFA | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.23% | -28.19% | +16.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | 0.00% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.79% | -4.93% | +2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.97% | — |
Volatility
REFA vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REFA | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.61% | 15.14% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 16.22% | +2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 16.35% | +2.26% |
REFA vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
REFA has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
REFA vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
REFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than BKIE's 3.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.19% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% |
REFA Columbia Research Enhanced International Equity ETF | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, REFA and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for REFA.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 0.03% for REFA.
REFA tracks Beta Advantage Research Enhanced International Equity Index, while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Columbia Threadneedle and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for REFA and 0.04% for BKIE.
Find the right allocation for REFA and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer